2001
DOI: 10.1124/mol.59.3.532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Agonist Activity at the α2A-Adrenergic Receptor

Abstract: Constitutive activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is now well recognized and many classical GPCR antagonists have been found to be inverse agonists. For the ␣ 2A -adrenergic receptor (AR) we determine the relative inverse efficacies of a series of antagonists and utilize the extended ternary complex model to estimate the fraction of constitutively active mutant (CAM) receptors in the active state. Stable Chinese hamster ovary cell lines expressing the porcine ␣ 2A -AR in its wild-type (WT) and con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altered affinities of agonists and inverse agonists in constitutively active mutated recep- (Costa and Herz, 1989;Samama et al, 1994;Wurch et al, 1999;Wade et al, 2001). Our binding studies using several H3 receptor agonists and antagonists certainly corroborated with this model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Altered affinities of agonists and inverse agonists in constitutively active mutated recep- (Costa and Herz, 1989;Samama et al, 1994;Wurch et al, 1999;Wade et al, 2001). Our binding studies using several H3 receptor agonists and antagonists certainly corroborated with this model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Previous studies have also failed to observe differences in the binding affinity of inverse agonists between wild-type and CAM receptors (Kjelsberg et al, 1992;Ren et al, 1993;Ford et al, 2002). Theoretical analysis predicts that even when 50% of the total receptor population is present in the active state, a shift of only 2-fold might be observed in the binding affinity of an inverse agonist at a CAM receptor (Wade et al, 2001;Strange, 2002); therefore, it is possible that the differences in the magnitude of constitutive activity between wildtype and CAM receptors are insufficient for differences in antagonist affinities to be detected in radioligand binding assays. However, it remains unclear why darifenacin (and to a lesser extent oxybutynin) exhibits such a reduced affinity for the CAM receptor (6-fold).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the extended ternary complex model, inverse agonists may exert their effects via a selectively higher affinity for the inactive (R i ) than for the active (R a ) receptor species and/or by reducing the affinity of the ligandbound receptor for its cognate G-protein (Samama et al, 1993;Strange, 2002). Thus, any perturbation of the system in favor of R a and/or R a G will result in a reduction in the apparent binding affinity of an inverse agonist for the receptor population (Costa and Herz, 1989;Samama et al, 1993;Huang et al, 1998;Wade et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining expression of human a 2A -receptors (particularly with a mutation at Thr 373 ) with rat G á0 protein gives rise to a constitutively active receptor that tonically suppresses production of cyclic AMP (87,113,116). Under these rather artificial circumstances, RX 821002, in common with yohimbine/rauwolscine, usually behaves as an inverse agonist at á 2A -adrenoceptors (87,113). More pertinently, a similar result has been obtained with native á 2A -adrenoceptors in rat brain slices treated with 100 ìM GTP (78).…”
Section: Rx 821002 As An Inverse Agonist At á 2 -Adrenoceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%