1995
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.1995.514_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Analysis of Scenery Evaluation of Planted Concrete Retaining Wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the results obtained using inverse analysis by GA, 14,15 in the present study, only some of the items contributed to the overall evaluation despite many items being available to choose from. The results obtained using neural network analysis (sensitivity analysis) are very different from the results of inverse analysis by GA for the following reasons.…”
Section: Inverse Analysis By Neural Networksupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the results obtained using inverse analysis by GA, 14,15 in the present study, only some of the items contributed to the overall evaluation despite many items being available to choose from. The results obtained using neural network analysis (sensitivity analysis) are very different from the results of inverse analysis by GA for the following reasons.…”
Section: Inverse Analysis By Neural Networksupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The questionnaire was performed by 10 evaluators using 12 planted concrete retaining wall photographs. 2,5,13,14 In this article, to establish a simpler evaluation scheme, inverse analysis using a neural network that has excellent adaptability to problems containing nonlinear data was attempted. The same questionnaire results obtained in the abovementioned inverse analysis by GA were used in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%