2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1297-319x(03)00065-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse correlation of each functional status scale of the SF-36 with degree of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (m-SLAM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have found no correlation between the SF-36 and disease activity (12,15,16). Others have found a relationship between the SF-36 and disease activity using the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure, or British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (18,24,25). Our study of patients with longstanding disease with low disease activity demonstrates that the majority of quality of life domains, as measured by the SF-36, do not change over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have found no correlation between the SF-36 and disease activity (12,15,16). Others have found a relationship between the SF-36 and disease activity using the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure, or British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (18,24,25). Our study of patients with longstanding disease with low disease activity demonstrates that the majority of quality of life domains, as measured by the SF-36, do not change over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, inconsistent results have been reported regarding the influence of disease activity and damage on quality of life. Some studies have demonstrated a lack of correlation among these outcomes while others have shown disease variables to be strong predictors of quality of life (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). A recent review of quality of life in SLE concluded that there was no correlation with disease activity or damage (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose a score of 10, on the basis of the distribution of the scores for patients otherwise considered to have moderate or marked disease activity as per the doctor's global assessment of disease activity 12 rather than a lower score. 59 Also, an instrument that assesses disease activity by organ system (such as the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index) may have been more appropriate for our analyses. 60 Unfortunately, we did not collect the clinical information necessary to score the BILAG in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 More recently, the LupusQoLß has been adapted and validated for the assessment of patients with SLE in the United States (LupusQoLß-US) and for Spanish-speaking populations. 27,28 Some studies have evaluated the validity of the LupusQoLß and its correlation with disease activity. 22,27 A recent cross-sectional study has shown that HRQOL is impaired in SLE patients and, more importantly, no association was found between the eight domains of the LupusQoLß and clinical or demographic variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%