2021
DOI: 10.1002/adts.202100414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Design of Nanoparticles Using Multi‐Target Machine Learning

Abstract: In this study a new approach to inverse design is presented that draws on the multi-functionality of nanomaterials and uses sets of properties to predict a unique nanoparticle structure. This approach involves multi-target regression and uses a precursory forward structure/property prediction to focus the model on the most important characteristics before inverting the problem and simultaneously predicting multiple structural features of a single nanoparticle. The workflow is general, as demonstrated on two na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To focus on the structural characteristics of nanodiamonds that are important to all of the properties, we incorporated recent results of multi-target regression that has previously been used as a basis or nanoparticle inverse design. [34] These results (reported elsewhere) achieved remarkably good performance (with low mean square error [MSE] and mean absolute error [MAE]) that are sufficient to predict property labels simultaneously without lost of accuracy or generalizability, as shown in the Supporting Information. The original approach began with feature engineering to exclude features with correlation over 95% (see Supporting Information for correlation matrix) and a variance of less than one standard deviation.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To focus on the structural characteristics of nanodiamonds that are important to all of the properties, we incorporated recent results of multi-target regression that has previously been used as a basis or nanoparticle inverse design. [34] These results (reported elsewhere) achieved remarkably good performance (with low mean square error [MSE] and mean absolute error [MAE]) that are sufficient to predict property labels simultaneously without lost of accuracy or generalizability, as shown in the Supporting Information. The original approach began with feature engineering to exclude features with correlation over 95% (see Supporting Information for correlation matrix) and a variance of less than one standard deviation.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…High-dimensional numerical target labels can be simultaneously predicted with high accuracy using random forests (RFs). [34] An RF [35] was a non-parametric ensemble tree-based method that made no assumption on the structure of the model and can intrinsically handle multi-task problems as the leaf nodes can refer to any collection of relevant classes. [36][37][38] RFs constructed a large number of decision trees and combined bootstrap aggregation, also known as bagging, [39] and random feature selection methods.…”
Section: Multi-target Random Forest Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-dimensional numerical target labels can be simultaneously predicted with high accuracy by using treebased ensemble methods such as random forests. 32 Tree-based methods are a nonparametric explanatory approach that makes no assumption on the structure of the model but exposes interpretable feature importances, making them ideal predicting structure/property relationships. They can intrinsically handle multi-task problems as the leaf nodes can refer to any collection of relevant classes, making them ideal for inverse design.…”
Section: ■ Data Sets and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is capable of outputting a set of target physicochemical characteristics that can simultaneously deliver a predefined set of properties without the need for additional optimization or an exhaustive data set that makes a priori prediction redundant. 32 In this work we apply this multi-target inverse design workflow to a 2D transition metal carbides data set generated by using electronic structure simulations to develop a property/structure relationship capable of predicting the best MXene for a given gravimetric capacity, voltage, and induced charge, simultaneously. This requires extending the methodology to include multi-target classification, as opposed to the multi-target regression models demonstrated in previous work, because the chemical formula of materials such as MXenes consists of discrete variables.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation