2020
DOI: 10.1364/ol.387404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse design of plasmonic metasurfaces by convolutional neural network

Abstract: Artificial neural networks have shown effectiveness in the inverse design of nanophotonic structures; however, the numerical accuracy and algorithm efficiency are not analyzed adequately in previous reports. In this Letter, we demonstrate the convolutional neural network as an inverse design tool to achieve high numerical accuracy in plasmonic metasurfaces. A comparison of the convolutional neural networks and the fully connected neural networks show that convolutional neural networks have higher generalizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, a neural network can be referred to as a forward model where the inputs are physical or geometrical parameters and outputs are optical parameters, or as an inverse model which predicts the output geometrical or physical parameters based on the input optical parameters. Some recent works have considered inverse-design-based approaches for metasurface optics [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58], many of which use neural networks (NNs) to accelerate optimization by reducing the required number of numerical simulations [47][48][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: A Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, a neural network can be referred to as a forward model where the inputs are physical or geometrical parameters and outputs are optical parameters, or as an inverse model which predicts the output geometrical or physical parameters based on the input optical parameters. Some recent works have considered inverse-design-based approaches for metasurface optics [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58], many of which use neural networks (NNs) to accelerate optimization by reducing the required number of numerical simulations [47][48][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: A Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We want to note that CNNs, relying on their capability of processing large dimensional data, have become an indispensable architecture that deal with photonic devices with the high DOF. [48,49]…”
Section: Design Of High Dof Photonic Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When leveraging a discriminative model for the design and optimization of photonic devices, training a surrogate model that approximates the physical responses of the devices is always necessary. For example, deep learning techniques have been leveraged for the modeling of photonic crystals, [49,50] metasurfaces, [51] and plasmonics. [52] The accuracy of the surrogate model determines the fidelity of the design and thus the additional efforts of post-processing the design.…”
Section: Efficient Modeling Of Photonic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the burgeoning field of metasurfaces, deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool for realising efficient inverse design of different types of plasmonic metasurfaces for different applications including spectral control, near-field design [9][10][11]. In 2018, Malkiel et al introduced a novel bidirectional DNN model which can realise both the design and characterisation of plasmonic metasurfaces [12] .…”
Section: Design Of Plasmonic Metasurfaces By Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%