2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse design of shell-based mechanical metamaterial with customized loading curves based on machine learning and genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along this line, ML is becoming an important tool to systematically design these novel architected metamaterials with desired properties and functionality beyond laboratory trial-and-error [43,257,258,259,260,261]. Comprehensive review papers have been published in recent years that reviewed and discussed the methodology and applications of ML in architected material design [31,262,263,264]. Herein, in this subsection, we will focus on reviewing recent advances in experimental efforts in ML-enabled design of architected materials.…”
Section: For Architected Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along this line, ML is becoming an important tool to systematically design these novel architected metamaterials with desired properties and functionality beyond laboratory trial-and-error [43,257,258,259,260,261]. Comprehensive review papers have been published in recent years that reviewed and discussed the methodology and applications of ML in architected material design [31,262,263,264]. Herein, in this subsection, we will focus on reviewing recent advances in experimental efforts in ML-enabled design of architected materials.…”
Section: For Architected Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are also often accompanied by various optimization frameworks employing metaheuristic search algorithms such as gradient-descent, 32−34 Bayesian methods, 35−37 and natureinspired algorithms. 13,38,39 With regard to the latter category of algorithms, swarm intelligence 40,41 and single or multiple objective genetic algorithm-based solutions 28,38,42,43 are among the most commonly used. Several examples of machine learning 28,44 and neural network-powered design tools 11,45−48 are also being applied in metamaterial design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 12 ] However, these methods are less suitable for inverse design tasks as they typically require high number of evolutions and have limited design exploration capabilities. [ 13–16 ] Furthermore, these algorithms necessitate the constant execution of physics‐based simulations to evaluate the objective function, adding to their computational demands and making them less efficient for designing complex metamaterial systems. [ 17,18 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%