2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse dynamics of mechanical multibody systems: An improved algorithm that ensures consistency between kinematics and external forces

Abstract: Inverse dynamics is a technique in which measured kinematics and, possibly, external forces are used to calculate net joint torques in a rigid body linked segment model. However, kinematics and forces are usually not consistent due to incorrect modelling assumptions and measurement errors. This is commonly resolved by introducing ‘residual forces and torques’ which compensate for this problem, but do not exist in reality. In this study a constrained optimization algorithm is proposed that finds the kinematics … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An informative cue, i.e. a CS, represents a great degree of activation among the brain's cortical neurons as the primary source of motor planning (Neige et al, 2018); thus, pairing CS with US can facilitate a boost of intrinsic information toward the CNS as inputs of sensory transformation relative to the pelvic position (e.g., Faber et al, 2018). This question goes beyond the objectives of the present study and is therefore a matter for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…An informative cue, i.e. a CS, represents a great degree of activation among the brain's cortical neurons as the primary source of motor planning (Neige et al, 2018); thus, pairing CS with US can facilitate a boost of intrinsic information toward the CNS as inputs of sensory transformation relative to the pelvic position (e.g., Faber et al, 2018). This question goes beyond the objectives of the present study and is therefore a matter for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In part, this may be because it was not necessary to calculate second order derivatives of position data. In addition, erroneous marker positions were corrected using the constrained optimization algorithm of Faber et al [ 33 ]. Thirdly, although the participants’ freshness was monitored and revealed no significant differences, the warm-up protocol was not standardized between sessions, and thus may have led to individual variation in warm-up degree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on 40 random starts of four participants the test-retest reliability in terms of the mean absolute difference between two analyses of the same start was 0.7 ± 0.8 cm. To further reduce noise and to obtain a description of the kinematics that was consistent with the rigid-body assumptions, the constrained optimization algorithm proposed by Faber et al [ 33 ] was used. This resulted in slightly adapted kinematic data that were mechanically consistent with the known external forces while deviations from the actually measured positions were minimised.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical human models are commonly based on inverse dynamics and are used to calculate joint loading such as the KAM during walking or other activities of daily living [28]. Gait simulation is often based on optimal control methods and can predict movement patterns based on individual input variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%