1959
DOI: 10.1080/00029890.1959.11989332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Elliptic Functions and Legendre Polynomials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If x and y are real with opposite signs, all quantities in (2.7) are real, but γ and the variable of P n are pure imaginary. This unnecessary complication occurs, for example, in arcsd if 0 < k 2 < 1; it is dealt with in [Ke,(5),(6)] by introducing a second polynomial S n that differs from P n by changing minus signs to plus signs. The polynomial R n (x, y) suffices for both signs of xy, and its symmetry was important in showing that the four series in each of three subsets have the same coefficients.…”
Section: Homogeneous Legendre Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If x and y are real with opposite signs, all quantities in (2.7) are real, but γ and the variable of P n are pure imaginary. This unnecessary complication occurs, for example, in arcsd if 0 < k 2 < 1; it is dealt with in [Ke,(5),(6)] by introducing a second polynomial S n that differs from P n by changing minus signs to plus signs. The polynomial R n (x, y) suffices for both signs of xy, and its symmetry was important in showing that the four series in each of three subsets have the same coefficients.…”
Section: Homogeneous Legendre Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Incidentally, in [Ke,(2)] a function R n (x) is defined that can be shown to be R n (1, x 2 ) in the notation used here.) Why, then, use R n instead of P n in Theorem 1?…”
Section: Homogeneous Legendre Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As an example, we shall expand the three elliptic integrals in powers of sin ¢ and show that the coefficients are Legendre polynomials. The first of these expansions was found recently by Kelisky [8] by a quite different method; the other two appear to be new:…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%