2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-010-4171-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse hydrogen bonds between SiH4 and hydrides of Na, Mg and Be

Abstract: The optimized geometries of the three complexes between MeH n (Me=Na, Mg, Be; n=1 or 2) and SiH 4 have been calculated at the B3LYP/6-311++g**, MP2/6-311++g(3df,3pd) and MP2/aug-cc-pvtz levels, respectively. The red-shift inverse hydrogen bonds (IHBs) based on Si-H, an electron donor, were reported. The calculated binding energies with basis set super-position error (BSSE) correction of the three complexes are 5.98, 8.65 and 3.96 kJ mol 1 (MP2/6-311++g(3df, 3pd)), respectively, which agree with the results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IHB was initially proposed by Rozas et al, in 1997 when investigating the intermolecular interactions in metal hydrides due to the electronegativity of the hydrogen atom is much stronger than many metal atoms (Rozas, et al, 1997). Later, the IHBs were also found in nonmetal hydrides, such as SiH 4 and XeH 2 (Blanco et al, 2008;Yuan, et al, 2011). But as a whole, IHBs are still very scarce due to lower electron affinity of the hydrogen atom in most of the X-H bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IHB was initially proposed by Rozas et al, in 1997 when investigating the intermolecular interactions in metal hydrides due to the electronegativity of the hydrogen atom is much stronger than many metal atoms (Rozas, et al, 1997). Later, the IHBs were also found in nonmetal hydrides, such as SiH 4 and XeH 2 (Blanco et al, 2008;Yuan, et al, 2011). But as a whole, IHBs are still very scarce due to lower electron affinity of the hydrogen atom in most of the X-H bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%