2020
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2020.3013879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Kinematics of Redundant Manipulators With Dynamic Bounds on Joint Movements

Abstract: Redundant manipulators are usually required to perform tasks in the operational space, but collision-free path planning is computed in the configuration space. Limiting the deviation with respect to the collision-free configuration-space trajectory may allow the robot to avoid collisions without modifying the primary task. This paper proposes a method to guarantee that the solution of the inverse kinematic problem deviates from the nominal joint-space trajectory less than a desired threshold. The excursion lim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) MPC Schemes: Model predictive controllers have been proposed to address drawbacks of locally optimal controllers [31], [32]. Given that control performance is considered over a finite-time horizon [33]- [35], MPC provides a powerful option to fulfill control objectives of multiple tasks while constraints are not violated.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) MPC Schemes: Model predictive controllers have been proposed to address drawbacks of locally optimal controllers [31], [32]. Given that control performance is considered over a finite-time horizon [33]- [35], MPC provides a powerful option to fulfill control objectives of multiple tasks while constraints are not violated.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that control performance is considered over a finite-time horizon [33]- [35], MPC provides a powerful option to fulfill control objectives of multiple tasks while constraints are not violated. Nevertheless, in [31], [32], the task hierarchy is acquired via a weight-prioritized optimization problem [36]. It results in a soft task-prioritized inverse kinematics control scheme.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trajectory of the joint space of our manipulator was planned through fifth-order polynomial interpolation [18][19]. The first step is to constrain the joint angle, joint speed and joint acceleration of the start and end positions.…”
Section: Simulation Verification Of Working Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods can be found in Refs. [36][37][38]. However, the previous method based on arm angle parameterization is only suitable for the SRS manipulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%