2021
DOI: 10.1017/prm.2021.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse nodal problems on quantum tree graphs

Abstract: We consider inverse nodal problems for the Sturm–Liouville operators on the tree graphs. Can only dense nodes distinguish the tree graphs? In this paper it is shown that the data of dense-nodes uniquely determines the potential (up to a constant) on the tree graphs. This provides interesting results for an open question implied in the paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Koyunbakan and Mosazadeh [34], a Sturm–Liouville operator with boundary conditions dependent on the spectral parameter and discontinuous conditions at a=π2$$ a=\frac{\pi }{2} $$ (at midpoint) was investigated, and the uniqueness theorem for solution of the inverse nodal problem is provided, constructive procedure for the potential function by using nodal lengths is presented, Lipschitz stability for the inverse problem is studied. Additionally, in previous studies [35–38], inverse nodal problems and their important properties were examined for regular Sturm–Liouville and Dirac operators given with different properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Koyunbakan and Mosazadeh [34], a Sturm–Liouville operator with boundary conditions dependent on the spectral parameter and discontinuous conditions at a=π2$$ a=\frac{\pi }{2} $$ (at midpoint) was investigated, and the uniqueness theorem for solution of the inverse nodal problem is provided, constructive procedure for the potential function by using nodal lengths is presented, Lipschitz stability for the inverse problem is studied. Additionally, in previous studies [35–38], inverse nodal problems and their important properties were examined for regular Sturm–Liouville and Dirac operators given with different properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hald [2][3][4]. Several works improved their methods and extended them to other problems and different boundary conditions [5][6][7][8][9][10], the quasilinear p-Laplacian operator [11,12], differential pencils [13,14], eigenvalue depending coefficients or boundary conditions [15,16], and also to quantum graphs [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, most of these works assume the existence of a formula for the asymptotic behavior of eigenvalues or developed it using transmutation operators and Prufer's type transformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the direct problem, the inverse SLP is both attractive and open to improvement [24, 25]. In the inverse problem, parameters such as spectrum, norming constants, zeros of eigenfunctions, and Weyl function are given, and the coefficient of the equation qfalse(xfalse)$$ q(x) $$, the potential q$$ q $$, and the coefficients in the boundary conditions are found [26–29]. Normally, two spectra or a spectrum and norming constants are sufficient to find the potential q$$ q $$ as uniquely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%