2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.07.284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse optimal pinning control for synchronization of complex networks with nonidentical chaotic nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider then, the next dynamical model of a complex network with N nodes and linear and diffusive connections [11].…”
Section: Some Complex Network Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider then, the next dynamical model of a complex network with N nodes and linear and diffusive connections [11].…”
Section: Some Complex Network Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This motivates the study of a problem in which the nodeto-node coupling among the network nodes is different from the coupling exerted on the pinned nodes. Similar versions of this problem have been previously investigated in [26][27][28][29] using a Lyapunov function (V-stability) which provides a sufficient stability condition. In this paper, we investigate stability using linearization, which provides both necessary and sufficient conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One of the most used methods for complex networks is pinning control, in which only a fraction of the nodes is locally controlled [8]. This method has been studied in numerous studies; and has been expanded by combining it with other non-linear control methods such as sliding mode control, inverse optimal control, or neural networks [9][10][11][12]. One method not specific to complex networks is impulsive control, in which the control input is not applied continuously [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we want to begin by saying that each referenced study has made an important contribution to the field, each one with pros and cons, as our proposal also achieves. One of the points of our proposal is the use of pinning control where we can find studies such as [9][10][11][12]; these studies do not consider time-varying connections and they use pinning control techniques based on a neural network model of the complex network, whereas this proposal uses a discretization of the complex network based on passivity degrees. With respect to impulsive control applied to complex networks, we can find related works [14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%