2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10528-016-9719-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse PCR and Quantitative PCR as Alternative Methods to Southern Blotting Analysis to Assess Transgene Copy Number and Characterize the Integration Site in Transgenic Woody Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCR amplification is time and cost consuming in plant preparation and identification. Southern blot analysis, as a traditional method for identification of the transgenic copy number, is costly in terms of reagents, equipment, time and labour [40]. The GUS expression assay is a compromise in the matter of cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PCR amplification is time and cost consuming in plant preparation and identification. Southern blot analysis, as a traditional method for identification of the transgenic copy number, is costly in terms of reagents, equipment, time and labour [40]. The GUS expression assay is a compromise in the matter of cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Southern blotting analysis was performed in transgenic rapeseed plants according to the published methods with a minor modification [40]. Briefly, total genomic DNA was extracted using the standard CTAB method to obtain a large amount of DNA.…”
Section: Dna Extraction Pcr-based Identification and Southern Blottimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is plausible that the entire field of PLN functional research may have taken a different route, were the details of the genomic location of rather numerous PLN transgenes addressed early in their respective projects. Today not only the techniques of transgene characterization (review, (Stefano et al 2016)) have become substantially more accessible and affordable, but also the results of genomic mapping can be compared to a refined genome sequence and its functional annotation. They may immediately alert the researcher of any possible adverse genomic effects before physiological or behavioral studies may begin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Southern blotting analysis in transgenic rapeseed plants, total genomic DNA was extracted using the standard CTAB method to obtain a great amount of DNA [39]. 30 μg DNA from each sample was digested with EcoR I, which was flanking the DsRed gene in E1, E2…”
Section: Dna Extraction Pcr-based Identification and Southern Blottimentioning
confidence: 99%