1988
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(88)90335-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse photoemission spectroscopy of H, CO and NO adsorbed at Ni(100) and Ni(111) surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1.5 eV, and therefore consistent with inverse photoemission data, which place the center of the 2* resonance of adsorbed NO 1.5 eV above the Fermi level. 37 The absorbed energy is not entirely dissipated-rather, an energy gain of ⌬͗E͘ϭ͗E͘(T)Ϫ⑀ 0g ϭ0.022 eV is observed.…”
Section: A Estimating a Resonance Lifetimementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1.5 eV, and therefore consistent with inverse photoemission data, which place the center of the 2* resonance of adsorbed NO 1.5 eV above the Fermi level. 37 The absorbed energy is not entirely dissipated-rather, an energy gain of ⌬͗E͘ϭ͗E͘(T)Ϫ⑀ 0g ϭ0.022 eV is observed.…”
Section: A Estimating a Resonance Lifetimementioning
confidence: 97%
“…With the new potential parameters, the vertical excitation energy ͉g͘→͉e͘ becomes Ϸ1.5 eV ͑previously Ϸ2.5 eV͒, and fits now the experimental estimate. 37 The two-state system Hamiltonian is written as Ĥ ϭĤ e ͉e͗͘e͉ϩĤ g ͉g͗͘g͉ϩV eg ͉e͗͘g͉ϩV ge ͉g͗͘e͉, ͑2.3͒…”
Section: A Potentials and Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the adsorbed state one expects therefore the 2re manifold to straddle the Fermi level. IPE spectra of adsorbed NO have been reported by Rogozik et al [34] for Pd(100), by Johnson and Hulbert [14] for Ni(100) and Pd(111), and by Reimer et al [35] for Ni(100) and Ni(111). In all these cases the 2n* derived IPE structure appears 1.5-1.8 eV above E F with its tail Nevertheless the interpretation of the IPE spectra -as well as the UPS spectra -of adsorbed NO remains controversial [2,14,36].…”
Section: Strong Chemisorption: Diatomic Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The 2π* level of free NO is singly occupied, and is broadened as the molecule interacts with the surface sp‐band continuum . This is in contrast to the case of NO on transition metal surfaces, where the 2π* orbital is heavily hybridized with the d‐band and new states appear at ≈2 eV below and above the Fermi level . These situations are qualitatively related to the two simple limits of the Newns–Anderson model for chemisorption …”
Section: The No–substrate Interactionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On transition metal surfaces, the 2π* orbital is hybridized with narrow d‐bands through donation and backdonation processes, resulting in the loss of the unpaired electron . The 2π*‐derived states appear below (bonding) and above (antibonding) the Fermi level, and were observed by (inverse) photoemission experiments …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%