2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-021-04006-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Problem for the Yang–Mills Equations

Abstract: We show that a connection can be recovered up to gauge from source-to-solution type data associated with the Yang–Mills equations in Minkowski space $${\mathbb {R}}^{1+3}$$ R 1 + 3 . Our proof analyzes the principal symbols of waves generated by suitable nonlinear interactions and reduces the inversion to a br… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data for the problem arises form observations in a small set and the recovery is achieved on a causal domain where waves can propagate and return. The results here build upon our earlier work in [4,5] where we considered a cubic wave equation for the connection wave operator and the case of pure Yang-Mills theories, but this time we have the distinct objective of retrieving the Higgs field in addition to the connection (Yang-Mills field). The new couplings being introduced make the analysis of the non-linear interaction of waves quite complicated at first glance.…”
Section: Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The data for the problem arises form observations in a small set and the recovery is achieved on a causal domain where waves can propagate and return. The results here build upon our earlier work in [4,5] where we considered a cubic wave equation for the connection wave operator and the case of pure Yang-Mills theories, but this time we have the distinct objective of retrieving the Higgs field in addition to the connection (Yang-Mills field). The new couplings being introduced make the analysis of the non-linear interaction of waves quite complicated at first glance.…”
Section: Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We can now define the broken non-abelian X-ray transform. In [CLOP21a] and [CLOP21b], they define it as follows. Consider the set S + ( ) := {(x, y, z) ∈ D 3 : (x, y), (y, z) ∈ L, x < y < z with x, z ∈ , y ∈ }.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these works concern the (1 + 3)-dimensional case. In recent works [16,17,29], the authors have also studied problems of recovering zeroth-and first-order terms for semi-linear wave equations with Minkowski metric. We note that three wave interactions were used in [16,17] to determine the lower order terms in the equations and in modelling nonlinear elastic scattering from discontinuities [20,21].…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent works [16,17,29], the authors have also studied problems of recovering zeroth-and first-order terms for semi-linear wave equations with Minkowski metric. We note that three wave interactions were used in [16,17] to determine the lower order terms in the equations and in modelling nonlinear elastic scattering from discontinuities [20,21]. In [28,69] similar multiple-fold linearisation methods were introduced to study inverse problems for elliptic nonlinear equations; see also [61].…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%