2002
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690480508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse problems in population balances: Growth and nucleation from dynamic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Mahoney et al, 2002; Muralidar and Ramkrishna, 1986; Muralidar and Ramkrishna, 1989; Patruno et al, 2008; Patruno et al, 2009; Sathyagal et al, 1995; Wright and Ramkrishna, 1992). While these studies can provide invaluable guidance, their methods cannot be directly applied to address the challenges of inverse problems resulting from cell population balance models.…”
Section: Solving the Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Mahoney et al, 2002; Muralidar and Ramkrishna, 1986; Muralidar and Ramkrishna, 1989; Patruno et al, 2008; Patruno et al, 2009; Sathyagal et al, 1995; Wright and Ramkrishna, 1992). While these studies can provide invaluable guidance, their methods cannot be directly applied to address the challenges of inverse problems resulting from cell population balance models.…”
Section: Solving the Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has found application for the identification of both aggregation kinetics as well as growth/nucleation kinetics. Mahoney et al (2002) developed a strategy for inverse problem solution to identify the growth and nucleation kinetics under aggregation/breakage-free conditions. Under nucleation and growth conditions, the solutions can be characterised employing the method of characteristics, with each solution emerging from either the initial condition or the boundary condition.…”
Section: Inverse Problems In Population Balancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new approach is strongly related to the di erential method if applied to reaction kinetics. The computational steps for the example considered below are even identical but the incremental framework gives further insight into the model structure and provides a unifying framework for other stepwise identiÿcation methods such as that of Mahoney et al (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%