1974
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8928(75)90085-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse problems of the plane theory of elasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

8
145
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads, through the use of Kolosov-Muskhelishvili potentials, to a problem in complex variables for the shape of the inclusions. The problem is very similar to that addressed by Cherepanov (1974). Using his ideas we derive an explicit representation for the shape of the inclusions in terms of elliptic functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This leads, through the use of Kolosov-Muskhelishvili potentials, to a problem in complex variables for the shape of the inclusions. The problem is very similar to that addressed by Cherepanov (1974). Using his ideas we derive an explicit representation for the shape of the inclusions in terms of elliptic functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, this is probably what Vigdergauz had in mind when he first sought a periodic array of "equally strong inclusions", c.f. (Banichuk, 1977;Cherepanov, 1974;Eldiwany and Wheeler, 1986;Vigdergauz, 1983;Wheeler and Kunin, 1982). We explore this issue in section 5.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absolutely nontrivial and purely analytical example here consists of the equistress shapes (ESS) [Cherepanov 1974;Vigdergauz 1976;Banichuk 1977] along which the hoop stresses are simultaneously uniform [Cherepanov 1974] and globally minimal [Vigdergauz 1976]. In other words, an ESS is optimal with respect to both criteria, which, for brevity, will be referred to as and V , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the equistressness (1-5) for a general geometry and the M-equistressness (1-7) for a single hole were first derived as a stationary point of the variation of the strain energy integral over the solid phase with moving boundaries [Cherepanov 1974]. In contrast, we formulate the V-criterion as an essential relaxation of equistressness rather than variationally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%