2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01636.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Procedural Modeling by Automatic Generation of L‐systems

Abstract: We present an important step towards the solution of the problem of inverse procedural modeling by generating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work can also be viewed as a generalization of inverse procedural modeling [Aliaga et al 2007;Stava et al 2010;Bokeloh et al 2010], which aims to reconstruct a procedural representation from a given exemplar shape. Prior inverse procedural modeling techniques analyzed single example shapes in isolation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work can also be viewed as a generalization of inverse procedural modeling [Aliaga et al 2007;Stava et al 2010;Bokeloh et al 2010], which aims to reconstruct a procedural representation from a given exemplar shape. Prior inverse procedural modeling techniques analyzed single example shapes in isolation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While assuming no priors at all makes the task exceedingly difficult, several works have focused on exploiting a small set of domain-specific fundamental assumptions. Stava et al [9] proposed inverse procedural modeling of rules and parameter values for arbitrary 2D vector content (Figure 8). They assume terminal symbols are known and generate context-free rules for linear structures using L-systems.…”
Section: Inverse Procedures and Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1) are not captured by grammars like the ones produced in recent work [Št'ava et al 2010;Bokeloh et al 2010]. While these papers showed promising results, we pursue a different approach to be able to handle challenging layouts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative strategy is to infer a grammar directly from a single input object, given in the form of images [Aliaga et al 2007;Müller et al 2007] or geometry [Št'ava et al 2010;Bokeloh et al 2010]. All these previous approaches have in common that they spend most of their effort on image and geometry analysis to understand the structure of the input, with symmetry detection being a major technical ingredient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%