2016
DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2015.1096690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse shape design for heat conduction problems via the ball spine algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on equation ( 5) and according to the considered range of , the corresponding Froude number range is 0 ≤ ≤ 0.6/ . The governing equations are solved using a control-volume finite element solver [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] with a second-order temporal accuracy. A mesh resolution study is performed and it is found that a mesh size of × = 121 2 makes the problem independent of mesh size for both approximations in considered range of the and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on equation ( 5) and according to the considered range of , the corresponding Froude number range is 0 ≤ ≤ 0.6/ . The governing equations are solved using a control-volume finite element solver [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] with a second-order temporal accuracy. A mesh resolution study is performed and it is found that a mesh size of × = 121 2 makes the problem independent of mesh size for both approximations in considered range of the and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solver has been validated in several previous studies. [30][31][32][33][34] A mesh resolution study was conducted on the present problem; it was determined that a mesh having 181 azimuthal and 91 radial elements provided six significant figures of accuracy for pertinent measured quantities.…”
Section: The Annulus Enclosure and Numerical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergence criteria is considered as the maximum variation of the velocity and temperature fields over all nodes during two successive iterations less than 10 −7 . Accurate performance of the developed solver has already been validated in References 39‐46, but here it is evaluated by comparing the radial temperature profiles at three different angles including δ = 0 o , 90 o , and 180° vs dimensionless radius (rtrue˜=rri/rori) at Ra = 5 × 10 4 for air with Pr = 0.706. Computed profiles are plotted in Figure 2 and are compared with the results of Kuhen and Goldstein 8 .…”
Section: Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%