2014
DOI: 10.4171/rmi/813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse spectral positivity for surfaces

Abstract: Let (M, g) be a complete non-compact Riemannian surface. We consider operators of the form ∆ + aK + W , where ∆ is the nonnegative Laplacian, K the Gaussian curvature, W a locally integrable function, and a a positive real number. Assuming that the positive part of W is integrable, we address the question "What conclusions on (M, g) and on W can one draw from the fact that the operator ∆ + aK + W is non-negative ?" As a consequence of our main result, we get a new proof of Huber's theorem and Cohn-Vossen's ine… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result in the following proposition was established under the additional hypothesis that the Gauss curvature of the immersion be integrable in [32,Theorem 3 (ii)] and left as an open problem in [32,Remark 2]. Solutions have been proposed in [65,50,6,58]. 4 Here we present a short proof based on a result by D. Fischer-Colbrie.…”
Section: Appendix C Rigidity Of Stable Minimal Cylindersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The result in the following proposition was established under the additional hypothesis that the Gauss curvature of the immersion be integrable in [32,Theorem 3 (ii)] and left as an open problem in [32,Remark 2]. Solutions have been proposed in [65,50,6,58]. 4 Here we present a short proof based on a result by D. Fischer-Colbrie.…”
Section: Appendix C Rigidity Of Stable Minimal Cylindersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Since [9], the relation between the non-negativity of operators of the type −Δ + aK + V (a ∈ R + , V ∈ L 1 loc (M )) on a surface M and the conformal type of M has been the subject of increasing interest. A beautiful and general result appeared in [2], and we refer to this paper also for an up-to-date account on the problem. …”
Section: ) Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We refer to [23,17,3,20] as well as Appendix C of [8] for discussions and proofs of the following refinement of the latter alternative in Lemma 2.2.…”
Section: Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may repeat the above argument starting with any of the surfacesΣ(r) for r > 0 sufficiently small, using that they are homologically* area-minimizing in (M ,ĝ). 3 A continuity argument then gives that (M ,ĝ) is either standard S 1 × R × [0, ∞) or standard S 1 × R × [0, a] for some a > 0. Lemma 3.1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%