2017
DOI: 10.1134/s1063779616060174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse-square law violation and reactor antineutrino anomaly

Abstract: We discuss a possibility that the so-called reactor antineutrino anomaly can be, at least in part, explained by applying a quantum field-theoretical approach to neutrino oscillations, which in particular predicts a small deviation from the classical inverse-square law at short but macroscopic distances between the neutrino source and detector. An extensive statistical analysis of the reactor data is performed to examine this speculation.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…that approximately corresponds to 0.7-1.2 eV for the spectrum and reactor/detector averaged effective parameter σ eff , reciprocal of which, 1/σ eff ∼ (0.2-0.3) µ, characterizes, in order of magnitude, the spatial-temporal overlap between the wave packets of the particles and nuclei involved into the antineutrino production and detection processes. These results are roughly consistent, within uncertainties, with our earlier estimates [62], which did not include the data from the new reactor experiments, the most influential of which is DANSS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…that approximately corresponds to 0.7-1.2 eV for the spectrum and reactor/detector averaged effective parameter σ eff , reciprocal of which, 1/σ eff ∼ (0.2-0.3) µ, characterizes, in order of magnitude, the spatial-temporal overlap between the wave packets of the particles and nuclei involved into the antineutrino production and detection processes. These results are roughly consistent, within uncertainties, with our earlier estimates [62], which did not include the data from the new reactor experiments, the most influential of which is DANSS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this article, which is a continuation of our previous studies [61][62][63], we discuss an explanation of the RAA alternative (fully or partially) to the sterile neutrino hypothesis and complementary to the more prosaic one, associated with the difficulties in the ν e flux modeling. Our hypothesis is based on the possibility of violation of the classical (geometric) inverse-square law (ISL) at short but macroscopic distances between the (anti)neutrino source and the detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…,(36) disappear again, and similar to (10), we obtainΣ ren sj (R) = v s v j f + sj (ℓ s n; ℓ j κ) 2 dΩ(n) = σ ren sj , and σ ren j…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…When the experimental resolution will permit to distinguish between these different renormalized differential scattering fluxes (37) at different R, the perturbative mode j = 1 with different s 1 modes (arised in Eqs. (26, (27), (29), (36)) will be the most interesting for observation due to the amplification factor (35). Now for the total cross-sections all the inverse-power terms in (29)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%