2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse viscosity problem for the Navier–Stokes equation

Abstract: We consider an inverse problem of determining a viscosity coefficient in the Navier-Stokes equation by observation data in a neighborhood of the boundary. We prove the Lipschitz stability by the Carleman estimates in Sobolev spaces of negative order.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for similar inverse problems for the Navier-Stokes equations, see Bellassoued, Imanuvilov and Yamamoto [7], Choulli, Imanuvilov, Puel and Yamamoto [15], Fan, Di Cristo, Jiang and Nakamura [20], Fan, Jiang and Nakamura [21]. Gaitan and Ouzzane [23], and Gölgeleyen and Yamamoto [24] [4], Klibanov and Timonov [46], Lavrent'ev, Romanov and Shishat·skiȋ [49].…”
Section: Partial Observability Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for similar inverse problems for the Navier-Stokes equations, see Bellassoued, Imanuvilov and Yamamoto [7], Choulli, Imanuvilov, Puel and Yamamoto [15], Fan, Di Cristo, Jiang and Nakamura [20], Fan, Jiang and Nakamura [21]. Gaitan and Ouzzane [23], and Gölgeleyen and Yamamoto [24] [4], Klibanov and Timonov [46], Lavrent'ev, Romanov and Shishat·skiȋ [49].…”
Section: Partial Observability Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where in the last inequality we have used Lemma 2.3 again. Finally, substituting (16), (18) into (15) and taking N , C 0 D C e 2T e 3 T 2 and s N s, where N s can be taken of the form N s D s 0 C C.1 C T 2 /e 4T e 3 T 2 , we get the desired estimate (7). This ends the proof of Theorem 2.1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Puel and Yamamoto [13] gave the first Lipschitz stability result for a multidimensional inverse problem for a hyperbolic equation. Later, this method was extended for many varieties of equations and system, such as [14,15], [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Especially, [14] concerned an inverse problem for a Schrödinger equation and where the method in the proof of the Lipschitz stability is the key ingredient to prove our stability result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those global Carleman estimate is convenient for proving the Lipschitz stability for an inverse source problem (e.g., [3]) and the exact null controllability ( [6]), but is not suitable for proving the unique continuation, and such a weight function does not admit Carleman estimates for the Navier-Stokes equations coupled with first-order equation or hyperbolic equation such as a conservation law. As for Carleman estimates for the Navier-Stokes equations, see also Fan, Di Cristo, Jiang and Nakamura [4] and Fan, Jiang and Nakamura [5] with extra data in a neighborhood of the whole boundary, which is too much by considering the parabolicity of the equations. We prove Lemma 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%