2019
DOI: 10.1080/00288306.2019.1695633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion history of the northern Tasman Ridge, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand: implications for petroleum migration and accumulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D structure of the CEF is resolved to a depth of ∼8 km using high‐quality industry 2D and 3D seismic‐reflection lines covering a region 80 km long and up to 35 km‐wide (Figure 1; Seebeck et al., 2020, 2021). The CEF is a Late Cretaceous‐Palaeocene normal fault that was inverted (i.e., reverse reactivated) during the Miocene and has subsequently accommodated a further phase of Plio‐Pleistocene to Recent normal faulting (Nicol et al., 2005; Reilly et al., 2015; Seebeck et al., 2020), which is the subject of this paper. The geometry of the CEF fault surface changes along strike and down dip, therefore providing the opportunity to test how introducing a realistic fault geometry influences simulated earthquake catalogs (compared with, e.g., a simple planar approximation to fault geometry).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The 3D structure of the CEF is resolved to a depth of ∼8 km using high‐quality industry 2D and 3D seismic‐reflection lines covering a region 80 km long and up to 35 km‐wide (Figure 1; Seebeck et al., 2020, 2021). The CEF is a Late Cretaceous‐Palaeocene normal fault that was inverted (i.e., reverse reactivated) during the Miocene and has subsequently accommodated a further phase of Plio‐Pleistocene to Recent normal faulting (Nicol et al., 2005; Reilly et al., 2015; Seebeck et al., 2020), which is the subject of this paper. The geometry of the CEF fault surface changes along strike and down dip, therefore providing the opportunity to test how introducing a realistic fault geometry influences simulated earthquake catalogs (compared with, e.g., a simple planar approximation to fault geometry).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CEF is well imaged by geophysical data and has been extensively studied (King & Thrasher, 1996; Nicol et al., 2005; Nodder, 1993, 1994; Seebeck et al., 2020, 2021). The 3D structure of the CEF is resolved to a depth of ∼8 km using high‐quality industry 2D and 3D seismic‐reflection lines covering a region 80 km long and up to 35 km‐wide (Figure 1; Seebeck et al., 2020, 2021). The CEF is a Late Cretaceous‐Palaeocene normal fault that was inverted (i.e., reverse reactivated) during the Miocene and has subsequently accommodated a further phase of Plio‐Pleistocene to Recent normal faulting (Nicol et al., 2005; Reilly et al., 2015; Seebeck et al., 2020), which is the subject of this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations