1982
DOI: 10.1090/s0273-0979-1982-14962-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of Abelian integrals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second description of T g Θ is a consequence of [Ke1]. The second description of T g Θ is a consequence of [Ke1].…”
Section: Let Us Define the Kummer Morphism Kummentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The second description of T g Θ is a consequence of [Ke1]. The second description of T g Θ is a consequence of [Ke1].…”
Section: Let Us Define the Kummer Morphism Kummentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(ii) All our results apply equally well to the linearized inversion of abelian integrals problem [5]. It is only necessary to supply the correct technical means for translating the section Do + ~b0-1 ( ) into a section of the linearized bundle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Hence we have a surjective map of vector bundles p* -> xg+] ■ This is equivalent to having an injective map of the dual bundles xg+l -* M ■ Let Q be the quotient bundle. So we have an exact sequence (12) o-^-zi-iß-O. Now, Q is a bundle of rank 2g -(g + 1) = g -1.…”
Section: This Completes the Proof Of Part (1)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, there is of yet no explicit description of these Picard bundles. They were initially investigated by Kempf [12], and Mattuck [16,17]. Gunning has shown [6] that the rank g + 1 Picard bundle sits inside the rank 2s Clifford bundle, representing the well-known transformation properties of second order theta function under half periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%