2010 IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cacsd.2010.5612841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of linear and nonlinear observable systems with series-defined output trajectories

Abstract: Abstract-The problem of inverting a system in presence of a series-defined output is analyzed. Inverse models are derived that consist of a set of algebraic equations. The inversion is performed explicitly for an output trajectory functional, which is a linear combination of some basis functions with arbitrarily free coefficients. The observer canonical form is exploited, and the input-output representation is solved using a series method. It is shown that the only required system characteristic is observabili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is remarked that the same parameterization (11) and ( 12) can be obtained for arbitrary non-flat outputs of a controllable and observable linear system, if the output is defined as polynomial series with undetermined coefficients [15]. Then, the outputs do not need to be redefined to flat, or controller canonical form outputs.…”
Section: Remark: Generality Of the Parameterization For Linear System...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is remarked that the same parameterization (11) and ( 12) can be obtained for arbitrary non-flat outputs of a controllable and observable linear system, if the output is defined as polynomial series with undetermined coefficients [15]. Then, the outputs do not need to be redefined to flat, or controller canonical form outputs.…”
Section: Remark: Generality Of the Parameterization For Linear System...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Inspired by [13,23], the extraction of a previous state given the current state can be done by simultaneously solving a set of nonlinear equations, provided that the nonlinear dynamics (2) satisfy certain properties.…”
Section: Reducing Incompleteness Of Observation Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We record these bounds, as well as the observation probability value of the upper bound model to be used in the later stage (line 8-9). In the second stage, we attempt to find the smallest value for M odelC that can achieve the highest observation probability value (i.e., as the upper bound model) using a binary search scheme [4] (line [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Let the range between the two bounds be n, then the best, worst and average time complexity of the algorithm is O(1), O(logn), and O(logn), respectively.…”
Section: Combined Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%