2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of multiple intersecting high-resolution crosshole GPR profiles for hydrological characterization at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FWI results clearly show the boundaries of the main units at 12 and 16 m, which have a good correspondence with the findings of previous studies [6,9,10,11,12]. The boundary around 6.5 m depth is less clear (likely the base of a sandy lens within Unit 4 that is continuous between wells C5 and C6, W. Barrash, pers.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Observed And Simulated Radar Tracessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The FWI results clearly show the boundaries of the main units at 12 and 16 m, which have a good correspondence with the findings of previous studies [6,9,10,11,12]. The boundary around 6.5 m depth is less clear (likely the base of a sandy lens within Unit 4 that is continuous between wells C5 and C6, W. Barrash, pers.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Observed And Simulated Radar Tracessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The geophysical responses caused by changes in relative dielectrical permittivity ε or electrical conductivity σ can be linked to the aquifer parameters of porosity, permeability, fluid content, and salinity (e.g., Hagrey and Müller, 2000;Garambois et al, 2002;Turesson, 2006). In this paper, we discuss the use of crosshole bistatic ground-penetrating radar (GPR) tomography to provide high-resolution images of the subsurface electromagnetic (EM) parameters, which can be closely related to the hydrogeologic parameters (e.g., Binley et al, 2001;Tronicke et al, 2004;Johnson et al, 2007;Bradford et al, 2009;Doetsch et al, 2010a;Dafflon et al, 2011). In conventional GPR tomography, first-arrival times and first-cycle amplitudes of the transmitted radar pulses are used in ray-based inversion schemes to visualize the interwell medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note the closer correspondence in the lower portion of the stratigraphy in which K and porosity are more related in the Kozeny-Carman sense . sion of σ 0 measurements are broadly supportive of the multiscale heterogeneity affecting hydraulic, lithologic, and geophysical parameters, which has been demonstrated in the sedimentary structure of the site (Barrash and Clemo, 2002;Barrash and Reboulet, 2004), and recognition of two types of electrical-porosity (and dielectric-porosity) behavior evident in the subdivision of unit 2 into units 2A and 2B (Ernst et al, 2007;Irving et al, 2007;Mwenifumbo et al 2009;Dafflon et al, 2011b). Observation of ∅ and CR logs and analysis of correlation between ∅ and CR show strong correlation at the stratigraphic unit scale but highly variable weak to strong correlation at the subunit scale (Figure 14 here and Barrash and Cardiff, 2013).…”
Section: Units and Multiscale Structurementioning
confidence: 54%
“…Furthermore, crosshole GPR analysis was conducted by Ernst et al (2007) and Irving et al (2007). Dafflon et al (2011b) invert multiple intersecting high-resolution crosshole GPR profiles at the BHRS and obtain a 3D distribution of ∅ values that are in broad agreement with the results of the geostatistical study by Barrash and Clemo (2002).…”
Section: Hydrogeophysical Settingmentioning
confidence: 69%