[Proceedings] IGARSS '92 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.1992.578294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of Surface Parameters Using Fast Learning Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although equation (16) works for the non-Gaussian parameter case, as demonstrated in our first example, the validity of this needs to be proven. Also, bounds need to be extended to the case where no signal model is given.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although equation (16) works for the non-Gaussian parameter case, as demonstrated in our first example, the validity of this needs to be proven. Also, bounds need to be extended to the case where no signal model is given.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…in MAP estimation), select an appropriate method to numerically evaluate the Cramer-Rao MAP bounds in (9) and (12). Use (16) for the case where C v is diagonal and 2 is Gaussian.…”
Section: B Transform Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are shown in figure 3 and and ω, which had a jointly uniform probability density. Here ε is the effective permittivity of the surface, kσ is the normalized rms height (upper surface kσ 1 , lower surface kσ 2 ), kL is the normalized surface correlation length (upper surface kL 1 , lower surface kL 2 ), k is the wavenumber, τ is the optical depth, and ω is the single scattering albedo of an inhomogeneous irregular layer above a homogeneous half space [8,9].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used to train the network was not back propagation, but was similar to the matrix method due to Barton [16]. In our version of the matrix [17], we utilize a conjugate gradient solution of the linear equations governing output weights. For the secollcl set, frequency parameters were again drawn from random deviates uniformly distributed over (0.1, 0.3) and used to synthesize 400 additional waveforms.…”
Section: W Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%