Inversion of surface wave data for subsurface shear wave velocity profiles characterized by a thick buried low-velocity layer

Abstract

The islands composing the Maltese archipelago (Central Mediterranean) are characterized by a four-layer sequence of limestones and clays. A common feature found in the western half of the archipelago is Upper Coralline Limestone (UCL) plateaus and hillcaps covering a soft Blue Clay (BC) layer which can be up to 75 m thick. The BC layer introduces a velocity inversion in the stratigraphy, implying that the V S30 (traveltime average sear wave velocity (V S ) in the upper 30 m) parameter is not always suitable for seismic microzonation purposes. Such a layer may produce amplification effects, however might not be included in the V S30 calculations. In this investigation, V S profiles at seven sites characterized by such a lithological sequence are obtained by a joint inversion of the single-station Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratios (H/V or HVSR) and effective dispersion curves from array measurements analysed using the Extended Spatial Auto-Correlation technique. The lithological sequence gives rise to a ubiquitous H/V peak between 1 and 2 Hz. All the effective dispersion curves obtained exhibit a 'normal' dispersive trend at low frequencies, followed by an inverse dispersive trend at higher frequencies. This shape is tentatively explained in terms of the presence of higher mode Rayleigh waves, which are commonly present in such scenarios. Comparisons made with the results obtained at the only site in Malta where the BC is missing below the UCL suggest that the characteristics observed at the other seven sites are due to the presence of the soft layer. The final profiles reveal a variation in the V S of the clay layer with respect to the depth of burial and some regional variations in the UCL layer. This study presents a step towards a holistic seismic risk assessment that includes the implications on the site effects induced by the buried clay layer. Such assessments have not yet been done for Malta.

Source analysis of a potential hydraulic‐fracturing‐induced earthquake near Fox Creek, Alberta

“…We further estimate the source spectrum for the event by correcting all amplitudes to the source, following the equations provided in Yenier and Atkinson [2015]. After correcting for average site effects [Farrugia et al, 2015], we obtained a stress drop of 6 MPa by matching the high-frequency amplitudes of the median horizontal PSA amplitudes (the observed earthquake source function, see Yenier and Atkinson [2015]). The value of 6 MPa is near the upper range of the stress drops for shallow (induced) events in CENA, consistent with those determined for regional events in other studies [Atkinson et al, 2014;Rebollar et al, 1982].…”

Automatic detection of ovarian cancer based on improved DWT transformation

“…From this distance, the first received wave is the boundary refracted wave, which moves in the second layer with the wave velocity after being reflected by the critical angle from the layer one and two interface. If the wave propagation velocity increases by increase of depth, the timedistance equation for these waves in a simple horizontal two-layer model will be [12,13]:…”

Transdimensional and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo inversions of Rayleigh‐wave dispersion curves: a comparison on synthetic datasets

“…In the first case, the observed data (dispersion curves) are semi‐analytically derived from the true model, while in the seismic tests, the dispersion curves are extracted from seismic shot gathers computed on the reference models by means of the reflectivity algorithm (Mallick and Fraser, 1987). In all the following experiments, we limit to consider the fundamental mode as the observed data, although it is known that higher modes are essentially to better constraints the solution in case of shear velocity inversions and/or high stiffness contrasts within the soil column (Feng et al ., 2005; Luo et al ., 2009; Cercato, 2011; Farrugia et al ., 2016; Sajeva and Menanno, 2017; Qiu et al ., 2019). We return to this aspect in more detail in the discussion section.…”