1998
DOI: 10.1007/s000000050101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of the linearized Korteweg-de Vries equation at the multisoliton solutions

Abstract: Uniform estimates for the decay structure of the n-soliton solution of the KortewegdeVries equation are obtained. The KdV equation, linearized at the n-soliton solution is investigated in a class W consisting of sums of travelling waves plus an exponentially decaying residual term. An analog of the kernel of the time-independent equation is proposed, leading to solvability conditions on the inhomogeneous term. Estimates on the inversion of the linearized KdV equation at the n-soliton are obtained. Mathematics … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since they are linearized inhomogeneous KdV equations, linearized about a KdV solution, they are in principle explicitly solvable [18]. However, the form of the solution that results is quite complicated (see [19] and [11]), and thus it requires some effort to show that these solutions remain uniformly bounded in the norms which we use to bound the errors. As we noted above, the functions S 1 and S 2 do not actually form a part of the approximation at O( 4 ); however, we will show that they remain bounded over the time scales of interest as a part of controlling the error in our approximation.…”
Section: Formal Derivation Of the Modulation Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since they are linearized inhomogeneous KdV equations, linearized about a KdV solution, they are in principle explicitly solvable [18]. However, the form of the solution that results is quite complicated (see [19] and [11]), and thus it requires some effort to show that these solutions remain uniformly bounded in the norms which we use to bound the errors. As we noted above, the functions S 1 and S 2 do not actually form a part of the approximation at O( 4 ); however, we will show that they remain bounded over the time scales of interest as a part of controlling the error in our approximation.…”
Section: Formal Derivation Of the Modulation Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall solve the Boussinesq equation (1.3) numerically. Though techniques are known for finding explicit solutions to the linearized KdV equation (see [11] and [18]), the resulting expressions are quite complicated, and so we also solve (1.6) numerically.…”
Section: Some Numericsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exact formulation of the KdV equation comes from Korteweg and de Vries (1895) [15]. This equation was re-discovered in a numerical work by N. Zabusky and M. Kruskal in 1965 [34].After this work, a great amount of literature has emerged, physical, numerical and mathematical, for the study of this equation, see for example [5,14,30,18,9,28,27]. Although under different points of view, among the main topics treated are the following: existence of explicit solutions and their stability, local and global well posedness, long time behavior properties and, of course, related generalized models, hierarchies and their properties.This continuous, focused research on the KdV equation can be in part explained by some striking algebraic properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For explicit forms of these driving terms see the equations (22). Linearized KdV equations are explicitly solvable, though this is a complicated matter (see [27] and [15]). However, solutions are simple to compute numerically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%