2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion tectonics and magnetic fabrics in Mesozoic basins of the Western Tethys: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All sites revised in this work satisfy the following criteria. (a) They were sampled in weakly deformed deposits, without cleavage and/or penetrative structures to avoid the possible obliteration of the primary extensional magnetic fabric due to the reorientation of phyllosilicates and/or the formation of new mineral phases related to posterior compressional tectonic phases (García‐Lasanta et al, and references therein). (b) All analysed deposits correspond to red beds, a criterion to better compare magnetic fabrics coming from different works, as lithology (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sites revised in this work satisfy the following criteria. (a) They were sampled in weakly deformed deposits, without cleavage and/or penetrative structures to avoid the possible obliteration of the primary extensional magnetic fabric due to the reorientation of phyllosilicates and/or the formation of new mineral phases related to posterior compressional tectonic phases (García‐Lasanta et al, and references therein). (b) All analysed deposits correspond to red beds, a criterion to better compare magnetic fabrics coming from different works, as lithology (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regional and global sea‐level change curves show similar trends with negative significant rise, subjected the transgressive deposition more likely to tectonic results of the plate subduction (Haq, 2014; Haq & Al‐Qahtani, 2005; Meilijson et al, 2014). This may relate to the collision between AP and Eurasia, and ophiolite abundance along the northeast margin of the Arabian Platform (García‐Lasanta et al, 2018; Haq & Al‐Qahtani, 2005; Ozer et al, 2004) indicate stectonic activities occurred in the Late Cretaceous in the northwest part of the AP (Ashckenazi‐Polivoda et al, 2011; Ran et al, 2019; Zhao, Lai, Qin, Zhu, & Wang, 2017). The several to tens of metres deposition and subsequent hiatus between the Cretaceous and Palaeogene indicate that the transgression developed in a short time (Farouk et al, 2014; Meilijson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sections are located in Figure 1. Jordan Ruseifa and Al Hasa are modified after Abed and Fakhouri (1996), Jordan Zgaimat El Hasah and Wadi Arfa are modified after Abed and Amireh (1999) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] and ophiolite abundance along the northeast margin of the Arabian Platform (García-Lasanta et al, 2018;Haq & Al-Qahtani, 2005;Ozer et al, 2004) indicate stectonic activities occurred in the Late Cretaceous in the northwest part of the AP (Ashckenazi-Polivoda et al, 2011;Ran et al, 2019;Zhao, Lai, Qin, Zhu, & Wang, 2017). The several to tens of metres deposition and subsequent hiatus between the Cretaceous and Palaeogene indicate that the transgression developed in a short time (Farouk et al, 2014;Meilijson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Sequence Evolution and Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we interpret our AMS records as a sensitive proxy for tectonic strain. Numerous studies have also speculated that the magnetic fabric is a sensitive proxy, which begins to develop after deposition and development ceases when diagenetic processes have ended (Burmeister et al, 2009;Cifelli et al, 2004;García-Lasanta et al, 2018;García-Lasantaa et al, 2013).…”
Section: 1029/2018gc007944mentioning
confidence: 99%