2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2632(200004)85:2/3<141::aid-iroh141>3.3.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invertebrate Movements within a Small Stream: Density Dependence or Compensating for Drift?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dispersal of aquatic stages of benthic invertebrate species is even more limited. For these, dispersal is generally believed to be more effective downstream because of passive drift Williams 1993, Turner andWilliams 2000); yet, drifting distances are typically short (Elliott 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersal of aquatic stages of benthic invertebrate species is even more limited. For these, dispersal is generally believed to be more effective downstream because of passive drift Williams 1993, Turner andWilliams 2000); yet, drifting distances are typically short (Elliott 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because of both the uncertainty of event timing and of the practical difficulties in employing traditional capture-mark-recapture techniques (Southwood & Henderson, 2000;Turner & Williams, 2000). Molecular markers, such as allozymes and mitochondrial DNA, have been advocated as useful tools (Hogg et al, 1995;Hughes et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature has significant influence on the growth and development of lotic insects, and as a result of faster nymphal development, earlier emergence is to be expected (Sweeney 1984). Likewise, Turner and Williams (2000), when studying the same spring, found that emergence commenced about one week earlier near the source than further downstream. The smaller size of adults emerging upstream may be a function of their earlier emergence relative to adults emerging downstream, which may in turn be a function of the higher minimum temperatures for nymphal development (Williams & Hogg 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to differences in the timing of emergence, between-site variation in body size could be the result of differences in food availability (Hawkins 1986). The downstream site may have greater food availability as N. trispinosa densities are lower (13.9 + 2.3 SE and 92.8 + 19.4 SE, respectively;Turner & Williams 2000). Differences in the total invertebrate densities or the presence/absence of species between channels appear to be unlikely influences, as Hogg and Williams (1996) found that taxon richness did not differ according to thermal regime, whereas densities were in fact lower in the experimental channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%