Great Salt Lake Biology 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-40352-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invertebrates and Phytoplankton of Great Salt Lake: Is Salinity the Driving Factor?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that phytoplankton communities in mountain lakes are mainly related to phosphorus, nitrogen, and silicon contents, with Bacillariophytes predominantly closely related to silicon content and green algae mainly related to salinity (Krupa and Barinova 2015), consistent with the findings of the present study in brackish lakes. In addition, salinity and EC have been noted to strongly affect phytoplankton structure and abundance in the Great Salt Lakes, QTP lakes, and Baltic Sea coastal lakes (Barrett and Belovsky 2020;Krystian 2018;Zhaoxi 2021), which is in agreement with the results of the present study in brackish lakes. Although both brackish and freshwater lakes are affected by PCI such as water temperature and EC, phytoplankton communities as well as their main groups in brackish and freshwater lakes have been observed to show different environmental drivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It has been reported that phytoplankton communities in mountain lakes are mainly related to phosphorus, nitrogen, and silicon contents, with Bacillariophytes predominantly closely related to silicon content and green algae mainly related to salinity (Krupa and Barinova 2015), consistent with the findings of the present study in brackish lakes. In addition, salinity and EC have been noted to strongly affect phytoplankton structure and abundance in the Great Salt Lakes, QTP lakes, and Baltic Sea coastal lakes (Barrett and Belovsky 2020;Krystian 2018;Zhaoxi 2021), which is in agreement with the results of the present study in brackish lakes. Although both brackish and freshwater lakes are affected by PCI such as water temperature and EC, phytoplankton communities as well as their main groups in brackish and freshwater lakes have been observed to show different environmental drivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the Great Salt Lake (U.S.A.), centric and pennate diatoms dominate the phytoplankton assemblage when there are high inflows to the lake and when the salinity ranges from 13% to 15%. Furthermore, even with reduced inflows, salinity continued to decline, and diatoms were replaced by cyanobacteria and green algae, which increased in abundance (Barret & Belovsky, 2020). In Canadian soda lakes, increases in salinity and mean temperature are usually accompanied by a shift away from cyanophyte species, in favour of chlorophytes, cryptophytes, and chrysophytes (Evans & Prepas, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both a short and long-term perspective of the water level changes must be considered as the relative importance of background climate oscillations in ISL remains uncertain and often masks long-term trends in environmental variables but can be accounted for through more comprehensive statistical analyses [40]. Of course, trophic web changes in relation to the water level fluctuations are essential information to know the full spectrum of biodiversity of ISL [45]. This includes the distribution of habitats and communities on the shores of the lake, which also fluctuate as the water level markedly changes [46].…”
Section: The Likely Status Of Inland Salt Lakes By 2050 and Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%