2018
DOI: 10.5194/npg-2018-11
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverting Rayleigh surface wave velocities for crustal thickness in eastern Tibet and the western Yangtze craton based on deep learning neural networks

Abstract: Abstract. Crustal thickness is an important factor affecting lithosphere structure and deep geodynamics. In this paper, we propose to apply deep learning neural networks called stacked sparse auto-encoder to obtain crustal thickness for eastern Tibet and western Yangtze craton. Firstly taking phase and group velocities of Rayleigh surface wave simultaneously as input and theoretical crustal thickness as output, we construct twelve deep neural networks trained by 70,000 and tested by 30,000 theoretical models. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural networks‐based supervised deep learning approach has been proposed to solve the 1‐D Vs inversion problem and proven to be effective in cases characterized by repeated inversion of similar dispersion data with respect to the training data set (e.g., Meier et al., 2007). Different from fully connected neural networks (e.g., Cheng et al., 2019; Devilee et al., 1999), CNN can represent more complicated mapping functions for nonlinear inverse problems (Hu et al., 2020). A typical CNN based Vs inversion consists of three steps: (a) A labeled data set that consists of some synthetic dispersion curves labeled by their corresponding 1‐D Vs profiles (e.g., selected from CVM‐H in this study) is generated; (b) Then, a neural network generating model prediction (Gm ${G}_{m}$) is trained using the labeled data set (Figure 3a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neural networks‐based supervised deep learning approach has been proposed to solve the 1‐D Vs inversion problem and proven to be effective in cases characterized by repeated inversion of similar dispersion data with respect to the training data set (e.g., Meier et al., 2007). Different from fully connected neural networks (e.g., Cheng et al., 2019; Devilee et al., 1999), CNN can represent more complicated mapping functions for nonlinear inverse problems (Hu et al., 2020). A typical CNN based Vs inversion consists of three steps: (a) A labeled data set that consists of some synthetic dispersion curves labeled by their corresponding 1‐D Vs profiles (e.g., selected from CVM‐H in this study) is generated; (b) Then, a neural network generating model prediction (Gm ${G}_{m}$) is trained using the labeled data set (Figure 3a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supervised learning such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) based methods have been widely utilized in geophysical studies. The neural networks approach has been proven to be promising in surface wave studies, for instance, extraction of crustal thickness (Cheng et al., 2019; Devilee et al., 1999; Meier et al., 2007) from surface wave data, and automatic surface wave travel time dispersion picking (e.g., Zhang et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volcanic deformation was detected by using a CNN to classify interferometric fringes in wrapped interferograms (Anantrasirichai et al, 2018). The crustal thickness in eastern Tibet and the western Yangtze craton are estimated by Rayleigh surface wave velocities based on DNN (Cheng et al, 2019). The mantle thermal state of simplified model planets was predicted based on DL with an accuracy of 99% for both the mean mantle temperature and the mean surface heat flux compared to the calculated values (Shahnas & Pysklywec, 2020).…”
Section: The Earth's Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In seismology, a successful example is the use of deep learning for earthquake detection and phase picking (Jiang et al., 2021; Z. Li, 2021; Mousavi et al., 2020; J. Wang et al., 2019; Wong et al., 2021; Yu & Ma, 2021; L. Zhang et al., 2020; P. C. Zhou et al., 2021; Y. Zhou et al., 2021). However, applications of deep learning methods in seismic structure inversions have been limited thus far, including super resolution images from low resolution by a CycleGAN and crustal thickness estimated from Rayleigh surface wave based on Deep Neural Networks (Cheng et al., 2019; Niu et al., 2020). A convolutional neural network (CNN) can automatically extract the internal features of an image and construct complex non‐mapping relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%