2014
DOI: 10.1177/1363460713516337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverting virginity, abstinence, and conquest: Sexual agency and subjectivity in classroom conversation

Abstract: This study examines youth sexual agency during sexuality lessons in a New Zealand secondary school. Employing poststructuralist discourse analysis, examples are highlighted in which girls (and boys) gain access to sexual agency. Through conversation, girls are simultaneously positioned as ‘asked’ and ‘pursuer’ and boys as ‘asker’ and ‘pursued’ whilst abstinence and virginity are imbued with sexual agency for both sexes. This study demonstrates that it is discursive versions of agency which hold central importa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Her study suggests that the justifications with pronominal forms as positioning devices contribute to constructing agency and social relations with each another. King (2014) explores the development of teenagers' sense of sexual agency through classroom conversations. The researcher audio-records and analyzes the interactions between the participants (students in a secondary school in New Zealand) when they are given a scenario for discussion during a sexuality lesson.…”
Section: Agency In Conversationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her study suggests that the justifications with pronominal forms as positioning devices contribute to constructing agency and social relations with each another. King (2014) explores the development of teenagers' sense of sexual agency through classroom conversations. The researcher audio-records and analyzes the interactions between the participants (students in a secondary school in New Zealand) when they are given a scenario for discussion during a sexuality lesson.…”
Section: Agency In Conversationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescents' understanding of sexuality is subject to the current discourses and concomitant power (Allen, 2007b). The view that a girl possesses the ability to choose whether to maintain or lose her virginity entails that humhandara becomes an affirmation of female power and agency, but contradictorily this agency is located in the very discourses which regulate female sexuality (King, 2014). It is apparent that there exists a stringent moral code on the subject of female sexuality in the community communicated through the virginity discourse.…”
Section: Virginity and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sexually agentive subject positions are ascribed, resisted, aligned to, and performed depending on the positioning of subjects in interaction (Thompson 2011; B. King 2014a,b). It is important not to dichotomize structure and agency (Eckert 2012; Bell 2016); rather the focus should be on how participants ‘use cultural and linguistic resources both flexibly and fixedly’ (Harissi et al 2012:540) as they contend with powerful ideologies about gender and sexuality that form part of the broader sociocultural context of interaction.…”
Section: Performativity Gender and Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%