Investigación Forense de Desastres. Un marco conceptual y guía para la investigación

Oliver‐Smith, Anthony; Alcántara-Ayala, Irasema; Burton, Ian; Lavell, Allan M.

doi:10.14350/sc.02

Cited by 57 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…fostering transdisciplinary dialogs among experts, practitioners, communities, policymakers, as well as interdisciplinary methods for data collection and analysis, building integrated research, such as provided by Forensic Investigations of Disasters' method (Oliver-Smith et al, 2016). These approaches and methods can involve each of four interconnected elements of EWS -risk knowledge, monitoring, communication and response capability.…”

Section: Framework For Enhancing Reflexivity About Pews and Citizen Smentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Studies on Participatory Early Warning Systems (P-EWS): Pathways to Support Citizen Science Initiatives

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: Global environmental change and disasters pose several challenges to governments, society and science. These challenges occurred in social contexts were information and communication technologies can be used to share data and information, engaging citizen scientists in multidirectional and decentralized knowledge creation initiatives. Often referenced as participatory (or people-centered) early warning systems, this has been of a great potential to improve decisions taken by both emergency institutions and exposed and/or affected communities. Several methodologies have been proposed, mainly in natural science, redefining traditional ways of transferring knowledge about scientific process to the public.

show abstract

Section: Framework For Enhancing Reflexivity About Pews and Citizen Smentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Studies on Participatory Early Warning Systems (P-EWS): Pathways to Support Citizen Science Initiatives

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Events to gather such multidisciplinary professionals such as international workshops are important opportunity to generate the list of strategic research methodology tools. Relatively few resources for disaster risk reduction and management research methods have been identified and some excellent examples are cited below [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. However most of these do not specifically address the full range of Health-EDRM research domains.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Methods and Ethics in Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management: The Result of the Kobe Expert Meeting

Aung

Murray

Kayano³

2019

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In October 2018, at Asia Pacific Conference for Disaster Medicine (APCDM), an expert meeting to identify key research needs was organized by the World Health Organization (WHO) Centre for Health Development (WHO Kobe Centre (WKC)), convening the leading experts from Asia Pacific region, WHO, WHO Thematic Platform for Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health-EDRM) Research Network (TPRN), World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine (WADEM), in collaboration with Asia Pacific Conference for Disaster Medicine (APCDM) and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). International experts, who were pre-informed about the meeting, contributed experience-based priority issues in Health-EDRM research, ethics, and scientific publication. Two moderators, experienced in multi-disciplinary research interacted with discussants to transcribe practical issues into related methodological and ethical issues. Each issue was addressed in order to progress research and scientific evidence in Health-EDRM. Further analysis of interactive dialogues revealed priorities for action, proposed mechanism to address these and identified recommendations. Thematic discussion uncovered five priority areas: (1) the need to harmonize Health-EDRM research with universal terms and, definitions via a glossary; (2) mechanisms to facilitate and speed up ethical review process; (3) increased community participation and stakeholder involvement in generating research ideas and in assessing impact evaluation; (4) development of reference materials such as possible consensus statements; and (5) the urgent need for a research methods resource textbook for Health-EDRM addressing these issues.

show abstract

“…Para ellos, a diferencia de los enfoques fisicalistas/naturalistas que enfatizan el papel del peligro natural, la centralidad radicaría en la vulnerabilidad social, en tanto condición de base estructural, construida y dinámica configuradora de la susceptibilidad espacial del riesgo (Maskrey, 2011). No obstante, si bien esta perspectiva estructuralista ha relevado el papel causal de los procesos políticos, económicos e históricos (Lavell, 2004), está ha descuidado el papel agentivo de las comunidades expuestas-susceptibles que resisten y/o transforman estas estructuras de vulnerabilización, reduciendo su papel a una mera «representación fetichista de víctimas homogéneas» (Oliver-Smith, Alcántara-Ayala, Burton y Lavell, 2016;.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Vulnerabilidad-resiliencia ante el proceso de riesgo-desastre: Un análisis desde la ecología política

Sandoval-Díaz

2020

Polis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Las nociones de vulnerabilidad y resiliencia se han instalado como categorías explicativas centrales del proceso de riesgo-desastre, tanto en lo académico como institucional. No obstante, ambas nociones se han configurado como significantes flotantes del campo discursivo de la gestión de riesgo de desastres, presentando distintos supuestos, expresiones, énfasis y formas relacionales. A partir de esto el presente trabajo busca analizar, en un primer momento la construcción del discurso de la vulnerabilidad-resiliencia en el campo académico-institucional, para posteriormente, explorar la producción de la vulnerabilidad y la emergencia de la resiliencia local, bajo el prisma del capitaloceno de corte extractivista de Chile. A modo de conclusión afirmamos la importancia de incorporar en la discusión de la reducción de riesgo de desastre, tanto el esclarecimiento conceptual, como la relación dialéctica diferencial entre vulnerabilidad-resiliencia a escala glocal, comprendiendo que el fortalecimiento de capacidades debe ir acompañado de la reducción de las injusticias espaciales y ambientales.

show abstract

Investigación Forense de Desastres. Un marco conceptual y guía para la investigación

Cited by 57 publications

References 20 publications

A Review of Studies on Participatory Early Warning Systems (P-EWS): Pathways to Support Citizen Science Initiatives

A Review of Studies on Participatory Early Warning Systems (P-EWS): Pathways to Support Citizen Science Initiatives

Research Methods and Ethics in Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management: The Result of the Kobe Expert Meeting

Vulnerabilidad-resiliencia ante el proceso de riesgo-desastre: Un análisis desde la ecología política

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About