Investigating academic dishonesty among Chinese undergraduate students: does gender matter?

Zhang, Yinxia; Yin, Hongbiao; Zheng, Lei

doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1411467

Cited by 52 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of other studies also show that male students tend to commit more academic cheating than female students, or in other words, women have a higher level of academic integrity than men [23][24][25][26][27]. The tendency of men to do more academic cheating or have lower academic integrity is influenced because men have higher expectations than women in academic matters, namely that men always want to be the best and stand out [28]. Emotions also influence the different levels of academic integrity between men and women.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Investigating Level of Academic Integrity on High School Students in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0

Sunawan¹,

Sutoyo²,

Nugroho³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academic integrity is an important part of the education process, which is a commitment and moral code in the academic world based on the fundamental values of honesty, trustworthiness, fairness, respect, responsibility. The rapid development of information and communication technology gives students the opportunity to be able to access information without limits. Students who have low academic integrity take advantage of the ease of technology to commit academic cheating in various ways. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of academic integrity of high school students in Central Java-based on differences in gender, grade levels, majors, school bases in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. This survey research was conducted on 204 high school students. The research instrument used was the academic integrity scale (α = 0.77). The results showed that there were differences in the level of academic integrity of students based on gender t (204) =-4.13 p <0.05, grade f level (2.203) = 4.20 p <0.05, majors t (204) = 2.82 p <0.05 base school t (204) = 0.97 p <0.05. The results can be used as a basis for further research in schools focusing on improving students' academic integrity.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Investigating Level of Academic Integrity on High School Students in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0

Sunawan¹,

Sutoyo²,

Nugroho³

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nonetheless, competitiveness -an aspect of male role norms -is pointed as a factor that is more determinant of dishonest behavior than gender itself (Zhang & Yin, 2018). Magian and Montinari (2017) found that, in the workplace, women who are more competitive and have higher performance are even more dishonest than male colleagues with the same levels of competitiveness and performance.…”

Section: Individual Characteristics and Dishonestymentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Advertising Pieces that Portray Brazilian Jeitinho Influence Dishonest Behavior?

Farias

Pilati

2021

Psico-USF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aimed at investigating whether watching Brazilian advertising pieces that portray a sociocultural behavioral pattern called Brazilian jeitinho would influence participant’s subsequent behavior. One carried out an experiment in which 200 subjects watched and assessed three advertisement pieces. Upon recruitment, participants were informed that they would be taking part in a raffle for a gift card. The number of tickets received per participant was defined by a die-under-cup task. The more tickets they obtained, the higher the chance to receive the prize, providing an incentive to cheat. Afterwards, respondents took part in a task that defined the number of tickets that each would receive to participate in the raffle. Independent variables consisted in the manipulation of priming of jeitinho (video content: jeitinho or neutral) and privacy of the task (with or without privacy). On the other hand, the dependent variable consisted in the result obtained when participants rolled the dices that defined the number of tickets. One found a significant difference between the groups in which privacy was manipulated, indicating that the groups that performed the task aimed at measuring dishonesty with privacy actually tended to report lower values than the ones actually obtained, entailing an effect of contrast. This finding suggests that the implementation of public policies that utilize propaganda that portrays Brazilian jeitinho could reduce engagement in dishonest behavior among Brazilians.

show abstract

“…Esto comprueba que la deshonestidad académica es recurrente en varios países asiáticos. La deshonestidad académica ha sido reportada en lugares de Asia del Norte, tales como Rusia (Maloshonok & Shmeleva, 2019), Asia Occidental, en Irán (Rezanejad & Rezaei, 2013); Israel (Steinberger, Eshet, & Grinautsky, 2021) y Georgia (Hancock, 2011), Asia Central, en Kazajistán (Zvonareva, 2019), Asia Orienta, en Corea (Ledesma, 2011), Taiwán (Yang, Chiang, & Huang, 2017), China (Zhang, Yin, & Zheng, 2018), Hong Kong (Kam, Hue, & Cheung, 2018), Asia del Sur, en India (Babu, Joseph, & Sharmila, 2011), y Pakistán (Aslam & Mian, 2011), y particularmente en el Sudeste Asiático, en Malaysia (Ibrahim, M., Ahmad, E., Al Harrasi, S. D., Ibrahim, 2020), Tailandia (omas, 2017), Vietnam (Tran, Huynh, & Nguyen, 2018) e Indonesia (Herdian & Wahidah, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Algunos estudiantes cometen plagio accidentalmente cuando no están familiarizados con la manera correcta de citar, recurren al parafraseo y demuestran la falta de habilidad a la hora de formular frases en sus propias palabras. Otros factores se relacionan con la actitud moral (Zhang et al, 2018), actitud (McKibban et al, 2019, normas subjetivas (Wijayanti & Putri, 2016), control comportamental percibido (Hendy & Montargot, 2019), optimismo (Siniver & Yaniv, 2019), motivación (Krou, Fong, & Hoff, 2020) y compromiso religioso (Onu, Onyedibe, Ugwu, & Nche, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Does Grit Guarantee Students Do Not Academic Dishonesty?

Herdian

Wahidah

2021

pnrm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academic dishonesty is still a concern of researchers in various parts of the world. this is because there are still many academicians doing this unethical behavior. We examine how Grit plays a role in academic dishonesty. Does grit guarantee students not to commit academic dishonesty? A quantitative approach is used in this research. A total of 408 students in Indonesia participated (M = 95; F = 313). The measuring instrument used is the Academic Dishonesty Scale adapted from Ampuni et, al (2019) with α = 0.860 and the Grit Scale for Children and Adult used by Wahidah (2019) with α = 0.727. The results show that Grit has a significant negative effect on academic dishonesty. The more gritty, the lower the academic dishonesty will be. We also discuss the implications in relation to education

show abstract

Investigating academic dishonesty among Chinese undergraduate students: does gender matter?

Cited by 52 publications

References 50 publications

Investigating Level of Academic Integrity on High School Students in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0

Investigating Level of Academic Integrity on High School Students in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0

Do Advertising Pieces that Portray Brazilian Jeitinho Influence Dishonest Behavior?

Does Grit Guarantee Students Do Not Academic Dishonesty?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About