Investigating antecedents and consequences of brand identification

Abstract

Original article can be found at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ Copyright Emerald [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]Purpose - This study aims to analyse the influences of prestige, satisfaction, and communication on brand identification and to show how brand identification influences word-of-mouth and brand repurchase. Design/methodology/approach - A theoretical model is developed and tested with a sample of car owners in the UK of two global car brands. Structural equation modelling was used with LISREL 8.54 and the maximum likelihood (ML) method. Findings - This paper draws mainly on the theory of social identity to provide a comprehensive understanding of conditions under which brand owners are likely to identify with their brand and the bases and consequences of such identification. It was shown that prestige, satisfaction, and communication effect brand identification. The study confirms that consumers' development of relationships via brand identification results in word of mouth about the brand and intentions to repurchase the brand. Furthermore, it was found that brand identification fully mediates the influences of prestige, satisfaction, and communication on word of mouth and brand repurchase. Research limitations/implications - The focus was on one country and one industry. Practical implications - Managers are provided with strategies that enhance the identification of their customers with their brand so that they can strengthen the customers' brand identification. Areas for future research are suggested. For instance, it could be interesting to test the model in a different industry and/or cultural context. Originality/value - Very few previous studies have looked at brand identification which is surprising considering it is such an important variable to influence word-of-mouth and brand repurchase. The study tests three antecedents to brand identification and two outcomes that have not been investigated previously. Overall, the study adds knowledge in this somewhat neglected area

Brand identification in higher education: A conditional process analysis

“…The branding literature increasingly emphasizes brand identity as a dynamic process which develops over time (da Silveira, Lages, & Simões, 2013;StokburgerSauer, Ratneshwar, & Sen, 2012). Recently, the application of a social identity perspective highlights a pivotal role of brand identification in the process of brand loyalty development (He, Li, & Harris, 2012;Kuenzel & Halliday, 2008).…”

Predicting Volunteers' Intention to Return: An Examination of Brand Personality, Prestige, and Identification of Sporting Events

“…Ahearne, Bhattacharya, and Gruen's (2005) study on customer-company identification indicated that the more the customers identify with a company the greater the impact on purchasing behavior. Similarly, Kuenzel and Halliday's (2008) study with a sample of car owners in the UK found brand identification plays a significant mediating role in the relationships between prestige, satisfaction, and communication and word of mouth and brand repurchase. The findings of Carlson et al's (2009) study in the sport context also revealed that a consumer's identification with the sport team brand had a positive impact on the number of games that fans watched and the amount of money spent on team-related retail purchases.…”

An Integrated Framework to Understand How Consumer-Perceived Ethicality Influences Consumer Hotel Brand Loyalty

“…While employees' organizational identification has been studied previously (Jones 2010, De Roeck andDelobbe 2012), consumers' attitudinal and behavioral responses toward brand identification require more research. Investigators believe that a better understanding of the concept of brand identification would provide deeper insights into brand management (Kuenzel and Vaux Halliday 2008), and suggest that strong brand identification can result in favorable responses of consumers toward the brand, including brand loyalty (Donavan et al 2006).…”