2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Characteristics of Quality Peer Mentors With Spinal Cord Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nurse- and physician-led interventions have been shown to be both cost-effective and successful in improving general physical activity participation [ 74 , 75 ]. Likewise, peers have contributed to general physical activity improvements and in some cases have been identified as preferred messengers [ 76 , 77 ]. It is possible that healthcare providers and peers, or others who are not professionally trained as exercise specialists, may be suitable choices for delivering generalized strength training interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurse- and physician-led interventions have been shown to be both cost-effective and successful in improving general physical activity participation [ 74 , 75 ]. Likewise, peers have contributed to general physical activity improvements and in some cases have been identified as preferred messengers [ 76 , 77 ]. It is possible that healthcare providers and peers, or others who are not professionally trained as exercise specialists, may be suitable choices for delivering generalized strength training interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other outcomes such as feeling understood have not been reported in previous SCI peer mentorship studies. Instead, the concept of understanding is discussed as a process/style of peer mentorship (e.g., mutuality of SCI experiences [7], providing empathy [20][21][22]). There maybe a missed opportunity to investigate the concept of understanding/feeling understood as an outcome in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the mechanisms of recruitment, the motivation of volunteers and potential attrition are essential foundations for subsequent training and intervention delivery. Evidence from other peer mentorship studies highlights the importance of refining recruitment inclusion criteria to reduce attrition, and of careful consideration of mentors’ preferences for matching [ 19 , 39 , 40 ]. Matching peer mentors with mentees, while an important component of personalised support, is “an inexact process” [ 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%