Investigating Climate Compatible Development Outcomes and their Implications for Distributive Justice: Evidence from Malawi

Abstract

Governments and donors are investing in climate compatible development in order to reduce climate and development vulnerabilities. However, the rate at which climate compatible development is being operationalised has outpaced academic enquiry into the concept. Interventions aiming to achieve climate compatible development “wins” (for development, mitigation, adaptation) can also create negative side-effects. Moreover, benefits and negative side-effects may differ across time and space and have diverse consequences for individuals and groups. Assessments of the full range of outcomes created by climate compatible development projects and their implications for distributive justice are scarce. This article develops a framework using a systematic literature review that enables holistic climate compatible development outcome evaluation over seven parameters identified. Thereafter, we explore the outcomes of two donor-funded projects that pursue climate compatible development triple-wins in Malawi using this framework. Household surveys, semi-structured interviews and documentary material are analysed. Results reveal that uneven outcomes are experienced between stakeholder groups and change over time. Although climate compatible development triple-wins can be achieved through projects, they do not represent the full range of outcomes. Ecosystem—and community-based activities are becoming popularised as approaches for achieving climate compatible development goals. However, findings suggest that a strengthened evidence base is required to ensure that these approaches are able to meet climate compatible development goals and further distributive justice.

Links between Climate Change Mitigation, Adaptation and Development in Land Policy and Ecosystem Restoration Projects: Lessons from South Africa

“…Dyer et al [16] observe that adequate participatory practices and community engagement, combined with establishment of successful multi-stakeholder partnerships, are key factors for project and policy objectives to be met. However, the capacity to set adequate objectives that address mitigation, adaptation and development is hampered by the difficulty in engaging locally to tailor actions that can address community-specific needs [17]. Focus on mitigation, adaptation and development dimensions varies across stakeholder groups at multiple levels, and there is a need to better understand how best to assess and integrate local-level perspectives into climate and development policy and practice.…”

Equity in human adaptation-related responses: A systematic global review

“…The projects professed to include particularly marginalized households in implementation (e.g., the extremely resourcepoor, elderly-headed, female-headed, those with disabled or chronically ill adult members) whose capacity to adapt to climate shocks and stresses is extremely low." 50 Some articles in this category focus on documenting evidence of risk reduction or reduced vulnerability, wherein marginalized groups are shown to successfully take up or benefit from adaptation responses.…”

The effects of climate change on human health in Africa, a dermatologic perspective: a report from the International Society of Dermatology Climate Change Committee

“…Climate compatible development (CCD) refers to “development that minimizes the harm caused by climate impacts, while maximizing the many human development opportunities presented by a low‐emissions, more resilient future.” Examples of CCD in low‐ and middle‐income African countries may include improved cook stoves, installation of solar lights, and improved forestry and farming techniques . Investigators studying the adoption of CCD in three regions in Malawi identified that these programs could be successful, though not all were . On average, two to three benefits each were experienced by households, and wealthier, youth‐headed, and male‐headed households benefited more than others …”

“…Investigators studying the adoption of CCD in three regions in Malawi identified that these programs could be successful, though not all were . On average, two to three benefits each were experienced by households, and wealthier, youth‐headed, and male‐headed households benefited more than others …”