2016
DOI: 10.17051/io.2016.12031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating cognitive structures in some basic chemistry concepts via word association test

Abstract: ABSTRACT. In this study it was aimed to investigate cognitive structures of pre-service science teachers in some basic chemistry terms via word association test. Data were analyzed according to the number of responses to each key word in the word association test and concept maps were drawn according to frequencies as well as relatedness coefficient. Results of this study showed that participants' strongest part of cognitive structures within the given keywords was "compound-molecule" relation and they have we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alanyazında kelime ilişkilendirme testinin kullanıldığı çalışmalar mevcuttur (Atabek Yiğit, 2016;Bahar ve Hansell, 2000;Ercan, Taşdere ve Ercan, 2010;Eryılmaz Muştu ve Özkan, 2019;Gökbaş, 2016;Işıklı, Taşdere ve Göz, 2011;Karatekin ve Elvan, 2016;Kaya ve Taşdere, 2016;Kostova ve Radoynovska, 2010;Sikumbang, Rakhmawati ve Suwandi, 2019). Söz konusu çalışmaların çoğunluğunun öğretmen adayları ile yapıldığı söylenebilir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Alanyazında kelime ilişkilendirme testinin kullanıldığı çalışmalar mevcuttur (Atabek Yiğit, 2016;Bahar ve Hansell, 2000;Ercan, Taşdere ve Ercan, 2010;Eryılmaz Muştu ve Özkan, 2019;Gökbaş, 2016;Işıklı, Taşdere ve Göz, 2011;Karatekin ve Elvan, 2016;Kaya ve Taşdere, 2016;Kostova ve Radoynovska, 2010;Sikumbang, Rakhmawati ve Suwandi, 2019). Söz konusu çalışmaların çoğunluğunun öğretmen adayları ile yapıldığı söylenebilir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…With this method, a list of the concepts associated with the stimulus (key) concept in students' minds is obtained. In this context, WAT is a complementary assessment and evaluation technique used in determining the inter-conceptual relationships in the cognitive structures of the participants in various fields of science and social sciences (Aladağ, Tapur and Duran, 2018;Atabek Yiğit, 2016;Bahar, Johnstone and Sutcliffe, 1999;Bozyiğit and Kaya, 2017;Derman and Ebenezer, 2018;Derman and Yaran, 2017;Gulacar, Sinan, Bowman and Yildirim, 2015;Kaya and Akış, 2015;Kaya and Aladağ, 2018;Taşdere, Özsevgeç and Türkmen, 2014;Aydemir, 2014;Karakuş, 2019) and revealing the conceptual change and determining the misconceptions (Bahar and Özatlı, 2003;Ercan, Taşdere and Ercan, 2010;Kaya and Taşdere, 2016;Nakiboğlu, 2008;Polat, 2013;Taşdere et al, 2014;Öztürk Demirbaş, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu yöntemle öğrencilerin zihninde, uyarıcı (anahtar) kavramla ilişkilendirilmiş olan kavramların listesi elde edilmektedir. Bu bağlamda KİT, fen bilimleri ve sosyal bilimler alanında çeşitli konularda katılımcıların bilişsel yapılarındaki kavramlar arasındaki ilişkileri tespit etmede (Aladağ, Tapur ve Duran, 2018;Atabek Yiğit, 2016;Bahar, Johnstone ve Sutcliffe, 1999;Bozyiğit ve Kaya, 2017;Derman ve Ebenezer, 2018;Derman ve Yaran, 2017;Gulacar, Sinan, Bowman ve Yildirim, 2015;Kaya ve Akış, 2015;Kaya ve Aladağ, 2018;Taşdere, Özsevgeç ve Türkmen, 2014;Aydemir, 2014;Karakuş, 2019), kavramsal değişimi ortaya çıkarma ve kavram yanılgılarını belirlemede (Bahar ve Özatlı, 2003;Ercan, Taşdere ve Ercan, 2010;Kaya ve Taşdere, 2016;Nakiboğlu, 2008;Polat, 2013;Taşdere ve ark., 2014;Öztürk Demirbaş, 2017) kullanılan tamamlayıcı bir ölçme ve değerlendirme tekniğidir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…When the studies carried out by using word association tests were reviewed, it was seen that almost all of those studies had been realized in the field of science education (Atabek-Yiğit, 2015;Atabek-Yiğit, 2016;Bahar et al, 1999;Bahar & Özatlı, 2003;Cardellini & Bahar, 2000;Çınar, 2016;Güneş & Gözüm, 2013;Kırtak & Demirci, 2012;Kostova & Radoynovska, 2010;Köseoğlu & Bayır, 2011;Kurt, 2013;Kurt & Ekici 2013;Kurt, Ekici, Aktaş, & Aksu, 2013a;Kurt, Ekici, Aktaş, & Aksu, 2013b;Nakiboğlu, 2008;Özatlı & Bahar, 2010;Özata-Yücel and Özkan, 2014;Özata-Yücel & Özkan, 2015;Polat, 2013;Schizas, Katrana, & Stamou, 2013). There are not many WAT studies which have been carried out in social sciences (Akman & Koçoğlu, 2016, Aydemir, 2014Aykaç, Bilgin, & Bacakoğlu, 2016;Bahar & Hansel, 2000;Deveci, Çengelci-Köse, & Gürdoğan-Bayır, 2014;Ersanlı, 2016;Karatekin, Topçu, & Aydınlı, 2016;Karatekin & Elvan, 2016;Kaya & Aladağ 2016;Işıklı, Taşdere, & Göz, 2011;Şimşek, 2013;Tokcan & Yiter, 2017;Tokcan & Topkaya, 2018) and in the field of information technologies (Eren, Şahin, Çelik, & Aktürk, 2014;Önal, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%