2019
DOI: 10.1144/petgeo2018-119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating controls on salt movement in extensional settings using finite-element modelling

Abstract: Salt structures present numerous challenges for targeting reservoirs. Salt movement within the subsurface can follow complex pathways, producing deformation patterns in surrounding strata which are often difficult to decipher. Consequently, the relative role of key salt flow drivers and geological sensitivities on salt structure evolution are often poorly understood. To address this, we have developed 2D geomechanical models using the finite element method to simulate salt diapir and pillow development in two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its low value, this shear stress is able to mobilize the salt, given the salt's average viscosity. The relatively low strain rates and low upper crustal temperatures used in this study yield an average salt viscosity between 10 17 and 10 19 Pa·s, consistent with typical values reported for salt rocks (Hamilton‐Wright et al., 2019; Marketos et al. 2016; Rowan et al.…”
Section: Evolutionary Model Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite its low value, this shear stress is able to mobilize the salt, given the salt's average viscosity. The relatively low strain rates and low upper crustal temperatures used in this study yield an average salt viscosity between 10 17 and 10 19 Pa·s, consistent with typical values reported for salt rocks (Hamilton‐Wright et al., 2019; Marketos et al. 2016; Rowan et al.…”
Section: Evolutionary Model Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Evolutionary geomechanical (forward) modelling can simulate time-dependent processes, such as deposition, tectonic loading, salt flow and porous fluid flow. Hence, it couples the deformation and strength of sediments with the development of geologic systems (Goteti et al 2012;Hamilton-Wright et al 2019;Thigpen et al 2019). The principal limitation of the evolutionary models is the difficulty in producing the observed present-day geometry (Nikolinakou et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finite-element modeling (FEM; models based on continuum methods) has enhanced our understanding of salt flow (Gemmer et al, 2005;Hamilton-Wright et al, 2019), minibasin dynamics (Fuchs et al, 2011;Fernandez et al, 2020), and stress evolution (Nikolinakou et al, 2018). FEM treats the overburden as continuous frictional-or viscous-plastic material, which is useful for studying ductile deformation, but it prevents the development of brittle structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recent advances in the numerical modelling of salt‐related deformation use finite element models (FEM), which are based on continuum methods. Such studies have focused on the physical conditions required for the initiation and development of diapirism (Chemia et al., 2008; Fernandez & Kaus, 2015; Fuchs et al., 2011; Gemmer et al., 2004, 2005; Hamilton‐Wright et al., 2019; Nikolinakou et al., 2017; Peel et al., 2020; Poliakov et al., 1993), the stratigraphic architecture of subsiding minibasins (Fernandez et al., 2020; Sylvester et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017), reconstructing the evolutionary history of salt‐affected stratigraphy (Ismail‐Zadeh et al., 2001, 2004; Pichel et al., 2017, 2019), and salt‐related stress (and strain) analysis (Heidari et al., 2017; Luo et al., 2012, 2017; Nikolinakou et al., 2012, 2014a, 2014b, 2018). FEM treats the overburden as a continuous frictional‐plastic or viscous‐plastic material, which prevents the development of realistic brittle deformation, for example, fracturing and faulting, in overburden stratigraphy (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%