2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2011.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating effectiveness and user acceptance of semantic social tagging for knowledge sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delone and McLean (1992) model (D&M model) identified six variables of IS success that influence technology acceptance of user groups. The TAM and D&M models have been successfully used in a lot of empirical research to predict behaviours in relation to technology acceptance (Huang, Lin and Chan, 2012). Al-Debei, Jalal and Al-Lozi (2013) used D&M model as foundational theory to investigate the role of web portals in improving job performance for employees.…”
Section: Technology Adoption Theory: Related Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delone and McLean (1992) model (D&M model) identified six variables of IS success that influence technology acceptance of user groups. The TAM and D&M models have been successfully used in a lot of empirical research to predict behaviours in relation to technology acceptance (Huang, Lin and Chan, 2012). Al-Debei, Jalal and Al-Lozi (2013) used D&M model as foundational theory to investigate the role of web portals in improving job performance for employees.…”
Section: Technology Adoption Theory: Related Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has also been demonstrated in previous studies. On the one hand, recognition and improvement of one's status or reputation can be motivators for sharing knowledge [94]. On the other hand, it has been shown that career advantages should be considered and worked out more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can result in the expansion of the formal structured vocabularies with new terms [24]. However this approach has its own limitations, mostly related to issues with vague meaning, term variations, homonyms and polysemy, and may result in tags that only make sense to an individual user, making it difficult to build a hierarchy of concepts [9].…”
Section: B2notementioning
confidence: 99%