Investigating Effects and User Preferences of Extra- and Intradiegetic Virtual Reality Questionnaires

Wagener, Nadine; Stamer, Mareike; Schöning, Johannes; Tümler, Johannes

doi:10.1145/3385956.3418972

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 35 publications

(111 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Even when questionnaires are embedded in the virtual environment, the consistency of the design with the environment can affect the user experience. Wagener et al [44] investigated the impact of the extent of integration and consistency of the questionnaire with the virtual environment on the user experience and the duration of the entire study. They considered four design alternatives for the questionnaire UI and categorized them as extradiegetic and intradiegetic.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Accordingly, investigating the influence of interaction type on task demands could be an important future research topic. Although the studies mainly used traditional 2D user interfaces, using a more consistent design approach for in-VR questionnaires may lead to a higher sense of presence, as discussed by Wagener et al [44]. Considering an appropriate user interface for questionnaire presentation, as well as improving interactions in VR, may lead to increased use of in-VR questionnaires.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, in this review, we expand the UI design options by considering intradiegetic and 3D UI elements, e.g. [21,44]. Accordingly, we identified two dimensions for this taxonomy: UI and interaction type.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Type of study Participants Questionnaires [15] Literature review, study on UI and interaction 10 IPQ, NASA TLX, UMUX, SUS [46] Study with application of inVRQ 13 SSQ and SUS [38] Study with application of inVRQ 22 SSQ [47] Study with application of inVRQ 43 Custom [48] Study with application of inVRQ 10 Custom [49] Toolkit Development -NASA TLX, SUS, SSQ [40] Study with application of inVRQ 32 Discomfort score [50] Study on presence in VR 36 IPQ, SUS [37] Study with application of inVRQ 13 SSQ and SUS [51] Study on immersion in VR 26 Custom [52] User study with application of inVRQ 24 NASA TLX, custom [53] Study with application of inVRQ -- [54] Study with application of inVRQ 60 SAM [55] Study with application of inVRQ 13 NASA TLX [9] Study on the influence of inVRQ 36 IPQ, SUS, PQ [56] Toolkit Development -- [21] Study on inVRQ UI design 16 NASA TLX, IPQ, SUS [35] Study on the influence of inVRQ 36 SUS, WS, IPQ [57] Study with application of inVRQ 28 WS and custom [58] Study on the influence of inVRQ 12 IPQ [59] Study with application of inVRQ 35 Custom [44] Study on inVRQ UI design 35 Presence and custom [41] Study with application of inVRQ 12 PANAS and presence [60] User study with application of inVRQ 38 Custom [61] Literature review --…”

Section: Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Literature Review and Taxonomy of In-VR Questionnaire User Interfaces

Safikhani,

Nacke,

Pirker

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous research demonstrates that the interruption of immersive experiences may lead to a bias in the results of questionnaires. Thus, the traditional way of presenting questionnaires, paper-based or web-based, may not be compatible with evaluating VR experiences. Recent research has shown the positive impact of embedding questionnaires contextually into the virtual environment. However, a comprehensive overview of the available VR questionnaire solutions is currently missing. Furthermore, no clear taxonomy exists for these different solutions in the literature. To address this, we present a literature review of VR questionnaire user interfaces (UI) following PRISMA guidelines. Our search returned 1.109 initial results, which were screened for eligibility, resulting in a corpus of 25 papers. This paper contributes to HCI and games research with a literature review of embedded questionnaires in VR, discussing the advantages and disadvantages and introducing a taxonomy of in-VR questionnaire UIs.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Literature Review and Taxonomy of In-VR Questionnaire User Interfaces

Safikhani,

Nacke,

Pirker

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Slightly modified measuring scales such as the reflection inventory scale [6] could prove beneficial in this regard. Based on research about the advantages of integrating questionnaires in VR [1,44], this questionnaire will be conducted while the users are still in their self-created VE to further increase reflection.…”

Section: Possibilities To Enhance Self-reflection Of Emotionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reflecting on Emotions within VR Mood Worlds

Wagener

Niess

2021

Adjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of The

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Virtual reality applications can be an effective tool for emotion regulation and therefore support emotional well-being and mental health. However, many VR applications focus on inducing (positive) emotions and there is little research on how users can express their emotions autonomously at home. Thus, there is a need to inquire how emotions can be expressed independently in virtual environments. To that end, this position paper presents VR Mood Worlds, a VR application for ER intervention, that allows users to visualise their emotions and thus supports emotion regulation and emotional well-being.

show abstract