Investigating gender differences in journal selection decisions: A survey of academic researchers

Abstract

This article examines the impact of gender on researchers' journal selection decisions, and thereby seeks to contribute to previous research on the impact of gender on academics' career progression and publishing performance. Prior research suggests that female academics suffer from lower levels of career progression and publishing than male academics. Research suggests various explicit factors that might influence this scenario, including bias in hiring, choice of discipline, and under‐representation of women in the academic workforce. However, no previous research has explored the factors associated with the publishing process itself that may also come into play. Using an international survey, this article explores gender differences in relation to journal choice factors including: expectations regarding the reviewing process, university policies and norms, familiarity with the journal, confidence, and publishing objectives. While both genders agree on the importance of some factors, it is also evident that women are more alert to issues of authority, expectations placed on them regarding publishing high‐quality articles, and career progression than are men. Men prioritize familiarity, experience, and speed more highly than do women. The findings suggest that women are focussed on what is required to succeed in the academic environment but further research on the relative engagement of women in all aspects of scholarly publication would help to provide a wider picture.

Journal selection behavior among early-career academicians in Iran: how they choose the most appropriate journal for their publications

“…They suggested while both genders agree on the importance of some factors, it is also evident that women are more alert to issues of authority, expectations placed on them regarding publishing high-quality articles and career progression than are men. Men prioritize familiarity, experience and speed more highly than women (Rowley and Sbaffi, 2020).…”

“…The findings revealed that there was no significant difference between the "attitudes and beliefs towards journal selection" as well as "familiarity with journal metrics" based on gender. The results are inconsistent with the results found by Rowley and Sbaffi (2020). They suggested while both genders agree on the importance of some factors, it is also evident that women are more alert to issues of authority, expectations placed on them regarding publishing high-quality articles and career progression than are men.…”

Tensions and challenges in the decolonisation of academic publishing: A cross‐tabulation analysis of articles in Island Studies Journal

“…We do not analyse gender. Gender influences what researchers choose to study, how they approach the publication process, and how they are treated within the publication process (Rowley & Sbaffi, 2021). However, during the study period, ISJ did not collect information on gender, and we cannot completely collect this information after the fact.…”