Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7668-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Human-Robot Trust in Emergency Scenarios: Methodological Lessons Learned

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the presence of an evacuation robot might alleviate some of the challenges of emergency evacuation, it is possible, however, that the use of robots could cause other issues. For example, our research has demonstrated that evacuees tend to overtrust an evacuation robot (Robinette et al, 2016c). Hence, they may follow a broken or lost robot, putting themselves at greater risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the presence of an evacuation robot might alleviate some of the challenges of emergency evacuation, it is possible, however, that the use of robots could cause other issues. For example, our research has demonstrated that evacuees tend to overtrust an evacuation robot (Robinette et al, 2016c). Hence, they may follow a broken or lost robot, putting themselves at greater risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, for real-world experiments, creating a convincing sham emergency is difficult given that subjects know that they are participating in an experiment. In the past we have, for example, used smoke machines to fill rooms and hallways with smoke in order to make the emergency convincing (Robinette et al, 2016c). But creating convincing sham emergencies that do not actually endanger the participant and are acceptable to an institutional review board is challenging.…”
Section: Simulation Versus Real-world Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AV ownership was investigated by several researchers. AVs are expected to be expensive, and in the most optimistic scenario, only 35% of the survey respondents were willing to use shared AVs, while others prefer personal ownership [30,31]. is is partly understandable, given the convenience of accessibility and being able to leave items in the vehicle.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, shared vehicles are predicted to be maintained better, to have higher security and to have less liability [27]. Regardless, Robinette et al [31] showed that AV technology would reduce ownership by 1.1 vehicle but would result in a 13% increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as unoccupied vehicles.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are not many research studies on how a robot can initiate communication and maintain a proper dialog with the human, particularly in applications where interactive user interfaces are not feasible (Fulton et al, 2019). Furthermore, effective and efficient ways of assessing risks in human-robot dialogue (Robinette et al, 2016;Sattar and Dudek, 2011) is another potential research problem in this domain.…”
Section: Human-robot Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%