Investigating Instructor Talk in Novel Contexts: Widespread Use, Unexpected Categories, and an Emergent Sampling Strategy

Abstract

Instructor Talk—noncontent language used by instructors in classrooms—is a recently defined and promising variable for better understanding classroom dynamics. Having previously characterized the Instructor Talk framework within the context of a single course, we present here our results surrounding the applicability of the Instructor Talk framework to noncontent language used by instructors in novel course contexts. We analyzed Instructor Talk in eight additional biology courses in their entirety and in 61 biology courses using an emergent sampling strategy. We observed widespread use of Instructor Talk with variation in the amount and category type used. The vast majority of Instructor Talk could be characterized using the originally published Instructor Talk framework, suggesting the robustness of this framework. Additionally, a new form of Instructor Talk—Negatively Phrased Instructor Talk, language that may discourage students or distract from the learning process—was detected in these novel course contexts. Finally, the emergent sampling strategy described here may allow investigation of Instructor Talk in even larger numbers of courses across institutions and disciplines. Given its widespread use, potential influence on students in learning environments, and ability to be sampled, Instructor Talk may be a key variable to consider in future research on teaching and learning in higher education.

Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math

“…We posit that these head-and-heart elements are especially important for underrepresented students, who often struggle with underpreparation due to economic and educational disparities prior to college (55), as well as social and psychological barriers such as stereotype threat and microaggressions (56,57). Our heads-and-hearts hypothesis claims that the effect of evidencebased teaching and instructor soft skills is synergistic for underrepresented students, leading to the disproportionate gains that are required to reduce achievement gaps (36,57).…”

Fear of the CURE: A Beginner’s Guide to Overcoming Barriers in Creating a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

“…Moreover, it provides opportunities for instructors to be transparent about the nature of science and foster a collaborative classroom community. While not specific to the course content, use of affirming language to frame discussions and activities within the CURE will likely have a strong influence on student experiences and may reduce student resistance (33)(34)(35). Moreover, learning how to troubleshoot, reflect, redesign, and persist in the face of challenges are all practical skills that students will use in the real world, no matter what careers they pursue.…”

“…Make students aware of benefits Employability/desirability of skills (29) Foster a collaborative classroom community Use of non-content "instructor talk" (33) abilities to design experiments (43). More affective learning outcomes may include attitudes about the nature of science, awareness of and interest in science-related careers, and persistence in STEM majors.…”

Attention Matters: How Orchestrating Attention May Relate to Classroom Learning

“…By signaling to students when key concepts are presented, highlighting critical links among different concepts, and providing clear instruction about when and how internal attention is to be engaged with specific prompts, one could ease this burden and help students learn how to guide their spotlight of attention optimally in the classroom. This use of language to provide explicit instruction about where to allocate attention is a common form of "instructor talk," or noncontent language used by instructors in classrooms (Seidel et al, 2015;Harrison et al, 2018), that may facilitate student learning.…”