2017
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1405241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating invisible writing practices in the engineering curriculum using practice architectures

Abstract: Investigating invisible writing practices in the engineering curriculum using practice architectures. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44 (1-2). pp. 71-84.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, engineering students need to be able to effectively communicate in order to be fully prepared for future professional workplaces. Much has been written about the importance of getting engineering students to write [19,20] There is also study on language learning and writing development for specific purposes, focusing on pedagogical content for STEM students studying languages other than English at the university level [21]. However, little has been published on new teaching methods for STEM students' language learning in higher education contexts.…”
Section: Rationale For Using Pbl For Practical Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, engineering students need to be able to effectively communicate in order to be fully prepared for future professional workplaces. Much has been written about the importance of getting engineering students to write [19,20] There is also study on language learning and writing development for specific purposes, focusing on pedagogical content for STEM students studying languages other than English at the university level [21]. However, little has been published on new teaching methods for STEM students' language learning in higher education contexts.…”
Section: Rationale For Using Pbl For Practical Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graduate engineering programs continue to focus on developing technical skills and knowledge rather than writing skills although academic currency is based on the ability to write and communicate technical ideas, not just succeed in research or coursework. While a few researchers consistently publish rigorous engineering communication and writing research (Leydens, ; Leydens, ; Leydens & Olds, ; McNair & Venters, ; Moskal & Leydens, ; Paretti, McNair, Belanger, & George, ) in technical communication venues, there has been a recent increase in publications addressing engineering writing in engineering education research venues such as the Journal of Engineering Education , the International Journal of Engineering Education , and the European Journal of Engineering Education (Baba, Cin, & Ordukaya, ; Conrad, ; Goldsmith, Willey, & Boud, ) and in the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (Paretti, McNair, & Leydens, ). At the graduate level, engineering writing literature is scarce and usually focuses on proposed interventions (Simpson, Clemens, Killingsworth, & Ford, ; Yalvac, Smith, Troy, & Hirsch, ; Zemliansky & Berry, ), such as Adams' Dissertation Institute that seeks to increase persistence and completion for underrepresented PhD students through writing bootcamps (Artiles, Matusovich, Adams, & Bey, ; Hasbún, Matusovich, & Adams, ).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research findings proofed that there are various problems for teachers in their fields, including difficulty in using information technology in the learning process (Alba & Trani, 2018;Swaramarinda, 2018;Ivanova, Frolov, & Nikulchev, 2016;Montrieux, Vanderlinde, Schellens, & De Marez, 2015), and in seeking information (Subekti, Purnomo, et al, 2018b). As a consequence, when the teachers are asked to write scientific articles as part of their professional works (Graham, 2018), the products tend to be low in quality (Goldsmith, Willey, and Boud, 2017) in terms of relevancy of references and productivity in the writing (Susantini, Sri, Budiono, & Raharjo, 2015). For this, they then need some pieces of training to maximize their potentials in terms of ILS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%