2019
DOI: 10.9734/jamcs/2019/45837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating K-means and Kernel K-means Algorithms with Internal Validity Indices for Cluster Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that the total intra-cluster variations on the GLA-BRA-180 dataset are relatively higher between k = 1 and k = 5 before the autoencoder compression process, compared to the total intra-cluster variations after the autoencoder compression process for the same k values. This demonstrates the importance of the autoencoder compression process in reducing intra-cluster variations and, consequently, improving the k-hyperparameter tuning processes and the quality of clustering results, as stated by [115].…”
Section: Elbow Visualization Of the Gla-bra-180 High-dimensional Data...mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results indicate that the total intra-cluster variations on the GLA-BRA-180 dataset are relatively higher between k = 1 and k = 5 before the autoencoder compression process, compared to the total intra-cluster variations after the autoencoder compression process for the same k values. This demonstrates the importance of the autoencoder compression process in reducing intra-cluster variations and, consequently, improving the k-hyperparameter tuning processes and the quality of clustering results, as stated by [115].…”
Section: Elbow Visualization Of the Gla-bra-180 High-dimensional Data...mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…MC Nemar's score [114] was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in the k-hyperparameter value before and after the autoencoder compression process on any high-dimensional dataset, specifically the GLA-BRA-180 dataset. Anova [115] was used to investigate whether there was a statistically significant difference between the performance of the existing techniques and the new technique in solving the challenges of a smooth elbow.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been proposed to choose the optimal value of K, in [19] we proposed to use the kernel Davies & Bouldin index to determine the optimal k value. In [27] we compare several internal validity indices to determine the optimal value of K clusters.…”
Section: Deep Neural Network (Dnn)mentioning
confidence: 99%