2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01271-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating landslide susceptibility procedures in Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this field, many researchers have used different models to assess the susceptibility of geohazards on different scales according to different factors, such as an artificial neural network model [33], a bivariate statistical approach [34], a Bayesian model [35], a machine learning method [36] and an information value model (IVM) [37,38]. For large-scale railway design problems, we adopt the IVM because it can assess the geo-susceptibility of a broad area very quickly.…”
Section: Geological Danger Of F-regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this field, many researchers have used different models to assess the susceptibility of geohazards on different scales according to different factors, such as an artificial neural network model [33], a bivariate statistical approach [34], a Bayesian model [35], a machine learning method [36] and an information value model (IVM) [37,38]. For large-scale railway design problems, we adopt the IVM because it can assess the geo-susceptibility of a broad area very quickly.…”
Section: Geological Danger Of F-regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, quantitative methods can be classified as deterministic and probabilistic methods which involve the mathematical relationship between landslides' occurrences and their associated affecting factors. Statistical and Machine Learning methods such as Binary Logistic Regression, Information Value, Likelihood Ratio, Logistic Regression (LR), and Multivariate Regression are some the quantitative methods applied for landslide susceptibility modeling and mapping [12][13][14][15]. Furthermore, few other algorithms with optimum performance and a higher degree of accuracy used in the landslide susceptibility mapping include Discriminant Analysis, Generalized Additive Models, Evidential Belief Functions, Weighted Linear Combinations, and Weights of Evidence [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the simulation before the landslide runout is more critical of managing a future risk as a result of debris flow. Inundation zones based on the best-and worst-case scenarios depending on the mobility of failed materials and basal geometry and thickness of the landslide can be predicted by numerical models [54][55][56]. The outcomes from SAR and InSAR can help derive landslide thickness as crucial inputs for such runout models [57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%