2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00187-015-0204-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating management control configurations using qualitative comparative analysis: an overview and guidelines for application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, to validate the statement that "prospector firms with high MC effectiveness have an organic structure" does not require consideration of prospector firms with low MC effectiveness. This is substantively different to tests for the statement that "prospectors firms with more organic structures have higher MC effectiveness", which to be (Bedford & Sandelin, 2015) Set of firms with ~A·B…”
Section: Appendix B Overview Of Qcamentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, to validate the statement that "prospector firms with high MC effectiveness have an organic structure" does not require consideration of prospector firms with low MC effectiveness. This is substantively different to tests for the statement that "prospectors firms with more organic structures have higher MC effectiveness", which to be (Bedford & Sandelin, 2015) Set of firms with ~A·B…”
Section: Appendix B Overview Of Qcamentioning
confidence: 61%
“…As an illustration, consider an example with two MC practices (A and B) hypothesized to have an association with MC effectiveness (Y) (Bedford & Sandelin, 2015). Assuming that each MC practice can take only one of two values, either 1 or 0 to indicate high and low use, then there are a total of four possible combinations (i.e.…”
Section: Appendix B Overview Of Qcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Our research question could be answer by using other methods described in the literature [48]. However, the utility of QCA in strategy and organization studies is widely probed by the literature due to numerous advantages that promote its use [49].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fsQCA cut-off values range from full non-membership (0.05) to full membership (0.95) with the 0.5 case representing the maximum ambiguity ( Table 2). For example, regarding firm size, companies have been classified in a continuous scale from 0 to 1 with companies with more than 73.5 employees being classified as "more large than small" and companies with less than 73.5 employees as "more small than large" [48]. After percentile determination, obtained breakpoints were adjusted on the basis of the knowledge of the sector and database characteristics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why our findings may also be read as evidence that an interrelated usage of various management control systems is necessary in order to reach ambidexterity. Thus, there may be dependencies between these systems in line with the notion that there are systematic relationships between various management control systems (e.g., Bedford and Sandelin 2015;Bedford et al 2016;Grabner and Moers 2013).…”
Section: Further Research Avenuesmentioning
confidence: 96%